View Poll Results: Which do you prefer?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • Alfa Romeo 33

    7 33.33%
  • Lancia Delta

    14 66.67%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Alfa Romeo 33 1.7 QV v Lancia Delta HF Turbo

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488

    Alfa Romeo 33 1.7 QV v Lancia Delta HF Turbo

    80's hatchbacks... Some facts:

    Alfa Romeo 33 1.7 QV

    -1712cc normally aspirated flat four, 120bhp, 148Nm
    -Front engined front wheel drive, 5 speed manual
    -5dr Hatchback 402cm, 910kg
    -0-60mph 9"1 seconds, top speed 119mph

    Lancia Delta HF Turbo

    -1585cc turbocharged inline four, 142bhp, 191Nm
    -Front engined front wheel drive, 5 speed manual
    -5dr Hatchback 389cm, 1000kg
    -0-60mph 8"5 seconds, top speed 126mph
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    i prefer the lancia, despite the wieght deficit. looks better too imo.
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    2,038
    I have a thing for Lancias, don't know why, but I love them. It's faster than the Alfa, too.
    Go n-ithe an cat thu, is go n-ithe an diabhal an cat

    When you go Home, Tell them for us and say 'For your tommorrow, We Gave Our Today.'

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Conrod
    Posts
    1,561
    Cars in early 80s suck the most, IMO. Sorry, no can do. Delta Integrale would be ahem....
    www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tallinn, Estonia
    Posts
    2,863
    Have you lads ever heard the fantastic sound of 1.7 boxer?

    33 for me then (actually I'd take both of them if I could).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Purdue, Indiana
    Posts
    1,499
    I'd take the Lancia. I've loved this car ever since I was a little kid. It is my favorite Lancia, second only to the Stratos.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by aNOBLEman View Post
    I'd take the Lancia. I've loved this car ever since I was a little kid. It is my favorite Lancia, second only to the Stratos.
    Just for your info, this is not the HF Integrale homologation special. It's much more tame front wheel drive version.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,068
    I think the Lancia although why two rather unreliable cars...?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Purdue, Indiana
    Posts
    1,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    Just for your info, this is not the HF Integrale homologation special. It's much more tame front wheel drive version.
    Yea I saw that (I'm not as stupid as I seem ), but I love it just the same.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    I even was not aware of an FWD turbo version. Was it supplied to all markets?
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Conrod
    Posts
    1,561
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    Just for your info, this is not the HF Integrale homologation special. It's much more tame front wheel drive version.
    That's why. They looked really, really really really crappy.
    www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,991
    Nice thread. Something else between the 1000hp Skylinezz and AMGs and Ms and other assorted fanboy machinery.

    Very tough question though. I think I'd take the Alfa. It's lighter to begin with and the Lancia probably does have turbo lag (I'm assuming that since it's an old car).
    I think I prefer the Lancia in terms of looks altough the red 33 is great. Looks very bland in white. The best colours for that car are red and black IMHO.

    I can't really choose . But I'd probably go for the Alfa.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Conrod
    Posts
    1,561
    I'd take a Saab 900 thou. They span from 70s to 90s right?
    www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    I would probably even prefer the Sud QV....
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Conrod
    Posts
    1,561
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    I would probably even prefer the Sud QV....
    That looked, much much better. Alfa with square lamps is as if a BMW with FWD.
    www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Alfa Romeo 159 (Progetto 939) 2005–2011
    By Colin17 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 05-21-2010, 08:17 AM
  2. Lancia Fulvia 1600 HF v Alfa Romeo Giulia Sprint GTA
    By Ferrer in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-12-2008, 05:13 PM
  3. Hide-Out Index
    By Sauc3 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 02:43 AM
  4. Fiat 500 Abarth Scoop
    By Street_Dreamer in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-23-2007, 11:29 PM
  5. Sultan of Brunei!!
    By lfb666 in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 131
    Last Post: 12-11-2006, 05:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •