The brand Ferrari already answers it. A Prancing horse is never a muscle car. Yes, perceptions on brands are always bias.
www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com
Daytona is an old car. Viper ain't. As i said, the capabilities doesn't dictate a car's segmentation in OUR perception. The capabilities of what you describe is a modern car's implementation which i see as prerequisites to be something capable and fast. Perhaps globalisation had forced US manufacturers touse independant linked suspension more, even on muscle cars, but that doesn't mean they will be comparable to MX-5 or F430 anytime soon. Same goes with weight and handling.
And they shouldn't be, Muscle car to me is more manly that sportscars. It's a 'male' only thing i guess.
www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com
Ford is a family car manufacturer as far as i'm concern.
I say MORE, doesn't mean those which are less is NOT. Nope, you just have to agree with me that i still feel Viper as a muscle car, and no matter it's capable or not on tracks, it will always remain a muscle car in many's perception. (maybe out of states... )
But seriously, it is a compliment.
www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com
The Mustang is not a muscle car. It is a pony car.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)