Originally Posted by
IBrake4Rainbows
My problem with the movie is two-fold. There is a delibrate rejection of previous Bond staples in some aspects of the piece which I find a mixed bag. The rejection of the Witticisms & snide remarks are appreciated, as is the sense of realism - but perhaps the story was too real - Bond is meant to be somewhat of a super-human figure and to show him as a flawed hero, while somewhat trendy in modern movies, is perhaps not the best solution.
From what I've seen in articles and interviews with the makers and Daniel Craig, that was a deliberate move in this film, to finish off what they started with Casino Royale in terms of the changes to Bond's character, and then go back the re-invented Bond from the start Royale, i.e the more realistic but still slightly superhuman hero, including the witticisms etc etc. Those really wouldn't have fit in this new movie.
Originally Posted by
NSXType-R
It might be a trilogy, it might not. How can you tell already?
Daniel Craig is contracted to do 4 movies.
Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
– Hunter Thompson