Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Ferrari F149 confirmed

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833

    Ferrari F149 confirmed

    From EVO:

    Quote Originally Posted by EVO.co.uk
    Ferrari will reveal its 'F149' in Paris in October

    Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo surprised both the audience and the Ferrari PR department at the Geneva press conference by announcing Ferrari will reveal their new front-engined V8 GT car (known internally as the F149) at this year’s Paris motor show in October.

    Those expecting an entry level Ferrari will be disappointed to hear the new F149 GT car will be priced above the basic F430 (priced at £138,500 here in the UK) when it goes on sale in 2009. Pervious reports that this car was to be a new Dino type Ferrari, priced sub £100,000, have proved to be very wide of the mark.

    Ferrari are still being cagey with the details but we do know the car will be a brand new design and will feature versatile architecture, which is taken to mean a choice of either 2+2 or 2 seat plus a luggage bench inside the cabin. Expect to see a conventional steel roof as standard, with either a glass or folding roof as an option.

    Engine is expected to be a revised version of the F430’s 4.3litre V8 with slightly more power thanks to new direct injection technology and new throttle bodies which should deliver lower CO2 emissions as well. This will be linked to the new gearbox that could be the DCT gearbox we know Ferrari have been working on.

    It’s exciting times for Ferrari, with this new model Ferrari are hoping to gain a new set of customers who have always been put off by the mid-engined layout of it’s V8 models up to now.
    Ferrari F149 confirmed | evo News | News | evo
    Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
    – Hunter Thompson

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    Sounds good to me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Interesting. I wonder how this will fit within Ferrari's range.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    372
    This car better look like GOD designed it, otherwise, I'd rather a V12 Ferrari 599.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,160
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    Interesting. I wonder how this will fit within Ferrari's range.
    Well, as a front engined GT car it could end up a more tempting proposition than either the 599 or 612. It should be lighter and more nimble, and will most likely be cheaper. Choice of either 2 seat or 2+2 is interesting too.

    Obviously, it will all depend on how she looks I guess.
    uәʞoɹq spɹɐoqʎәʞ ʎɯ

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    I really don't know what to make of this. When Ferrari announced a new line I was hoping for a true Dino; V6, mid-engine, light weight. In my head I pictured something somewhere between a 355 and an Elise. When they announced it would be a front engine V8 GT car and it would be called a Ferrari I was enraged. Now I just don't know what to think other than a latter-day GTE.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack_Bauer View Post
    Well, as a front engined GT car it could end up a more tempting proposition than either the 599 or 612. It should be lighter and more nimble, and will most likely be cheaper. Choice of either 2 seat or 2+2 is interesting too.
    Could be priced against the DB9 maybe? And yeah, the seating arrangement choice is interesting. It could mean it's either going to be very cramped in the back, or bigger than it should be.
    Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
    – Hunter Thompson

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    Well in the 612 two people can be comfortable in the back. I'm thinking that this will be smaller.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Goshen, IN
    Posts
    3,377
    Hm this will be curious in how it fits into the range, but I am dying to know what it will look like.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,160
    Quote Originally Posted by 2ndclasscitizen View Post
    Could be priced against the DB9 maybe?
    If that report is true then not in the UK it won't. They say it'll be more than the F430, which is already a sizable amount more than a DB9. Not sure how things would stack up in different markets though.
    uәʞoɹq spɹɐoqʎәʞ ʎɯ

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,189
    I'm glad Ferrari aren't making another Dino. Last time they made one, it was so crap, that they badged it as a "Dino" rather than a Ferrari.

    But I don't like the idea of it being a GT car... they should make a car smaller than the F430... a true driver's car... more of an Exige, than a DB9. They're making too many GTs... 599, and 612. That means soon, out of the 5 cars they make, 3 will be GT.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Roentgen View Post
    I'm glad Ferrari aren't making another Dino. Last time they made one, it was so crap, that they badged it as a "Dino" rather than a Ferrari.

    But I don't like the idea of it being a GT car... they should make a car smaller than the F430... a true driver's car... more of an Exige, than a DB9. They're making too many GTs... 599, and 612. That means soon, out of the 5 cars they make, 3 will be GT.
    Dino was a great car. Not really a Ferrari, but a great car none the less.

    The 599 GTB isn't a GT car, its a sports car. A Lotus Elise has a better ride and a smoother engine.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,160
    Quote Originally Posted by NicFromLA View Post
    Dino was a great car. Not really a Ferrari, but a great car none the less.
    I assume he was actually talking about the 308 GT4, which was badged as a Dino, rather than the sexy little 246 Dino. The GT4 certainly wasn't what you would call a great car.
    uәʞoɹq spɹɐoqʎәʞ ʎɯ

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack_Bauer View Post
    I assume he was actually talking about the 308 GT4, which was badged as a Dino, rather than the sexy little 246 Dino. The GT4 certainly wasn't what you would call a great car.
    I forgot about that one. Nice looking car though, especially in yellow.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    372
    Quote Originally Posted by NicFromLA View Post
    The 599 GTB isn't a GT car, its a sports car. A Lotus Elise has a better ride and a smoother engine.
    I've never driven a Ferrari 599 before, but I doubt its ride is worse than an Elise's. I also doubt your "smoother engine" claim in favor of the Elise...given that the Ferrari has a V12 and the Elise has a buzzing 4 BANGER.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. Ferrari F430 vs Lamborghini Gallardo
    By mx512p in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 09-27-2006, 04:57 PM
  3. New Ferrari driving school will open in Canada
    By <AAA-MOD> in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-06-2006, 05:57 AM
  4. Ferrari GG50 Concept 2005
    By Sauc3 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-29-2005, 11:32 AM
  5. 2005 Gumball 3000
    By johnnyperl in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 05-17-2005, 10:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •