Its the contrary i think
Since the speed of sound is ~constant you need shorter pipes for higher revs since the time is shorter for the compression wave to return to the valve at higher revs.
When tuning the intake pipes you get peaks and throughs in torque through the rpm range. For example
-peaks: 4000 8000 16000rpm
-throughs: 6000 9000 12000rpm
Then you time the exhaust waves so that you get
-peaks: 6000 9000 12000rpm throughs:
-throughs: 4000 8000 16000rpm
What you end up with is a smooth tourqe curve. 0.3 bar (4.3 psi) gauge pressure for the intake compression wave can be seen IIRC. But in this case 10psi~0.7 bar. This seems high. You can also use the effect of resonating plenum and timing the different cylinders together, but this gives lower pressure differences->lower gains. In a an engine analyzing tool i think i saw VE of 140% on one engine. VE>100% is quite normal i think
Leon, you spoke of overlap scavenging. I think that is less used in a lesser degree in road cars since it quickly gives a rough idle if the overlap becomes big. On racecars the overlap is very large and gives very rough idle, F1 idles at 4-5000rpm right?
This was on top of my head so please correct me if im wrong