Good point there FPV_GTHO...
Who the hell voted for WRX GO WHAAAAAAAAM PSHH WAAAAAM YOOO? That is reserved for fanboys only
They are not Sports Cars
They Are Sports Cars
WRX is, EVO isn't
EVO is, WRX isn't
WRX GO WHAAAAAAAAM PSHH WAAAAAM YOOO
Good point there FPV_GTHO...
Who the hell voted for WRX GO WHAAAAAAAAM PSHH WAAAAAM YOOO? That is reserved for fanboys only
Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
I know that a "open top" car is heavier and flexes more, but a "real" sportscar has to be open top, RWD and rear engine! To make some eksamples the Lamborghini Murciélago isnt a "real" sportscar, because it is AWD and tin-top... it may be a roadster now, but it was originally concieved as a coupé.
Sure a front-engine RWD is as good handling as a rear-engine RWD, but Historically and legaly speaking a front-engine RWD doent fit into the true sportscar categorie!
If you doubt me.... then ask the guys on Fifth-gear.... they will agree..
About a year ago they made a program with the theme: Sportscars, and then they told what exactly a "Sportscar" is!
"Power, Beauty, Soul" - Aston Martin
So according to your logic there were no sportscars prior to about 1960.Originally Posted by jones.dk
If you doubt me then try to find the Fifth gear show, which i think they called: "special on sportscars". Then you can see what i mean!!!!!Originally Posted by NAZCA C2
"Power, Beauty, Soul" - Aston Martin
Meh. Sounds rather a lot like Porsche propaganda to me!!!
I am backing Ralf for the win, he's always been fast there and won the Nurburgring last year so as long as he unlocks his awesome qualifying skills which we all know he has, and comes on top of Montoya in qualifying, a front row start for him could seal the victory. If not, Button or Alonso could be in with a shot, Montoya is not motivated enough this year and you can never rule out Mike.
Like the Evo/ Impreza, I don't really think Ralph is a good example of a sports car.Originally Posted by CoTTerik
Thanks for all the fish
They're sports sedans/saloons, IMO. I'd rather stick to the stricter, classical definition of sports car (open-top, 2-seater, etc.). Closed-top versions of these cars have been historically called GT's.
Engine layout generally doesn't matter too much, but why the rear-engine qualification over front-engined? Or is it mid-engine perhaps?...
Personally, I wouldn't base my definitive description of a sports car on what 5th gear says.Originally Posted by jones.dk
I think that proper supercars fit their description, but sports cars are a broader field.
I agree that sports cars should have open tops but front engine RWD. Classic British Sports cars follow this pattern: TVRs, Lotuses, Caterhams, Marcos and Morgan.
Thanks for all the fish
not sports car .. just high performance sedans
There is no terrible way of winning
there is just winning
perhaps you have to define sports car, with a litteral meaning not a subjectivie one.
so far all the "sports cars must be fr or mr or closed top" bla bla bla, are all subjective ratings and definitions. with the exception of mine , no road car is a sports car since none of them were designed from the ground up as a motor sports vehicle. while some cars like the 911 may have a racing heritage but they are just derived or toned down versions of the racing version (which is in most cases derived from the stock vehicle itself).
If the definition of a sports car is taken litterally, we see that no car on the public highways can be considered a sports car. if however we define a sports car as any vehicle which has or has had a racing heritage then there will be a whole load of these cars. From mini coopers to civics, ferraris to porsches, lan evos to imprezas, ect.
In conclusion, this whole post is meaningless jumble of fanboys who are devoted to any one type of vehicle and will stick to it till the new version of it comes out.
To make some examples of which cars fall into the true sportscar category (which i posted earlier...) i can mention the cars they showed in the program::: The BMW Z4, Porsche Boxster, Lotus Elise, BMW Z8, Honda S2000, Mazda MX5, Toyota MR2, TVR Tamora, Vauxhall VX220, Radical SR3 and Caterham Seven..... They are all Sportscars....Originally Posted by KnifeEdge_2K1
"Power, Beauty, Soul" - Aston Martin
Interesting find there, Matra. When it says that a sports car is an automobile equipped for racing. Were the EVO and WRX not developed for WRC competition? Being as they were, it is concievable to regard them as sports cars.Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
Fortune and glory, kid. Fortune and glory.
ha, hoist by my own petardOriginally Posted by cp01ae
Never thought about that cp, good point.
Damn, I'll have to accept them as sports cars then
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
The WRX and EVO aren't "equipped for racing" though.
They can be - but in standard form they are not, and therefore by that definition not sports cars
Last edited by Coventrysucks; 06-02-2004 at 03:37 PM.
Thanks for all the fish
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)