The Chevy HHR would count but perhaps it could be classified as a hatchback? Now that I think about it, there's a couple more wagons.
Audi A6 Avant
VW Jetta Wagon (I'm flabbergasted that they're not selling the Passat wagon here)
BMW 3 Series and 5 Series wagons
Toyota Matrix (maybe it's a hatchback? Sort of questionable, like the HHR)
Subaru WRX/STI
I would have included the Dodge Magnum if it weren't discontinued. I'm not familiar with the Korean car makers.
Volvo doesn't sell pure wagons anymore.
The XC70 is really a crossover, same thing as a Subaru Outback, but I would count it as a sort of a wagon.
I'm really annoyed that the Subaru Legacy wagon isn't sold here anymore.
I find your opinions very honest, that's why I wondered what you thought
As a matter a fact I also wondered about why there is no "sporty" suspension available throughout the range, when they have done the work with fitting a double wishbone setup on the GT. This also led my mind to: Why doesn't every car maker use double wishbone suspensions to make handling better.. Can it be that more expensive to produce, if it was the norm? Is it reliability issues with it that I don't know? I am only familiar with it on the racecars i have/have had.
My opinion on the car I have bought isn't all folded out yet, I have to do some more time behind the wheel. But I still feel, after picking it up, that I get a well equipped car for a reasonable price.
I have to disagree 110%. After some hours and days in SUV's I can't possibly think why I would ever buy an SUV. They are comfortable yes, but in a way that make you loose connection with the car you are driving and the surface you are dealing with.. They are either way to soft in the suspension, which makes the handling slow and incorrect, or you are so stupid that you buy one with "sporty suspension" which makes it like a high brick with wheels bolted on. A kidney-belt should be optional on such models. A sporty suspension should make the car perform better in turns, not just making it super stiff.. But center of gravitation will always be the SUV's worst enemy.
But I'm not gonna stop you, if you want to glide along in a couch/church bench feeling nothing at all about what you are doing, be my guest.
Reference SUV's on my behalf: Audi Q5, Volvo V60 R-Design (kidney killer), Cayennes, both Turbo and normal V6. Crapolini cars all of them, when it comes to what I like about cars, driving them more than on a highway.
Aha! Forbidden fruits are always the tastiest. And FYI, the grass in Europe IS greener than in NA
Thanks Brix!
There are obviously loads of ppl who disagree with who care not one wit about performance or the dynamics of a proper handling car....they are the SUV buyers and the ppl I was referring to. They just want to get from point A to point B with some utility and in something that makes them 'feel safe'. On second thought they are not disagreeing with you...they just have different purchasing criteria.I have to disagree 110%. After some hours and days in SUV's I can't possibly think why I would ever buy an SUV. They are comfortable yes, but in a way that make you loose connection with the car you are driving and the surface you are dealing with.. They are either way to soft in the suspension, which makes the handling slow and incorrect, or you are so stupid that you buy one with "sporty suspension" which makes it like a high brick with wheels bolted on. A kidney-belt should be optional on such models. A sporty suspension should make the car perform better in turns, not just making it super stiff.. But center of gravitation will always be the SUV's worst enemy.
But I'm not gonna stop you, if you want to glide along in a couch/church bench feeling nothing at all about what you are doing, be my guest.
Reference SUV's on my behalf: Audi Q5, Volvo V60 R-Design (kidney killer), Cayennes, both Turbo and normal V6. Crapolini cars all of them, when it comes to what I like about cars, driving them more than on a highway.
There are few other drawbacks besides the cost such as:
- it takes a lot of space compared to MacPherson setup.
- more components and connecting points to chassis equals higher maintenance costs.
Most extreme example here is a classic Saab 900 with double wishbone setup at the front. In order to remove driver's side upper control arm, the factory manual states rather bluntly that the engine has to come out first!
But then why go through all the trouble of developping this type of suspension and the only offering it with the 2.2 litre diesel and an automatic...? I guess it will through the same process the 4 wheel steering in the Laguna went, first offer it on the top of the range model and later offer it across the range.
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Well I guess it is a very cunning move from Peugeot.
Most journos report excellent handling from GT model, most customers see a very keen price of basic 508 - put two and two together...
And unlike the four wheel steering it's impossible to tell from the outside...
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
I just realized I rather miss Peugeots. All these bloody SUVs everywhere with their plastic fantastic interiors, ridiculous gas mileage, and submarine like handling...
But I digress. Nice buy!
Turning money into memories.
I guess it's all down to production costs as you mention. But as Ferrer say, why bother to make the effort on the GT if they don't offer it throughout the range?? I am pretty sure I would have checked the box if it was in the options list.
What I discovered with buying a Peugeot, compared to other brands, is the strict rules of the trim packages. Anyhow my car had to be produced to specifics from the factory, there where no chance of getting anny other extras than things listed in the options list for that specific trim level. As an example, I asked for flatt black interior details, instead of the carbonfiberish the Allure package offers, but there was no room for special orders. I guess everything is down to costs, in every chain of this.
Thanks Rasmus!!
That's a problem with generalist car makers. In many cases options are linked through packages or a specific for a certain trim level. For instance in the Volkswagen Golf if you want Xenon headlamps you have to have the Sport model which inevitably brings silly big wheels. It's quite annoying.
This doesn't happen with the so-called "premium" brands.
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
But this do also open up for easier negotiation of price .
ex.
If one should by a Golf "minimum" for 10000u (made up currency) and the "medium" cost 12000u - If you are only interested in lets say 1/4 extra parts, and make this clear to the salesman, and therefor are uncertain to spend the extra 2000u - he is more likely to drop the price on the medium (giving you are better deal). If it weren't in packages you would be able to do this as the price for lets use Xenon light would be a fixed price that the seller wouldn't drop, as he knows that you want the Xenon.
I'm a sparetime salesman (Phones not Cars), and therefor know this and has very often saved a few bucks by pushing the price on a whole package instead of the small things i knew i wanted. (Remember a higher trim level also has a higher resell price )
Also known as:
CTD and CrashTestDummy
And now it looks like this....
Olive Drab #33?
Interesting choice of color...
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)