No problemoOriginally Posted by distress
But it's still the quickest car on the roadOriginally Posted by distress
What do you drive?Originally Posted by distress
No problemoOriginally Posted by distress
But it's still the quickest car on the roadOriginally Posted by distress
What do you drive?Originally Posted by distress
Nah, it's only labeled that way, there is no proof of it hitting it's "claimed" 250mph top speed, and the car isn't really a production car in my mind.Originally Posted by Sweeney921
Koeinsegg CC is there at 242mph Supposedly..
The wind that blows in the Andes.
No, they are, those numbers were done by a Saleen test driver, no one else has been able to test the car though. Remember this is the 2004 S7, not 03.Originally Posted by Chinky_boi
Quickness is determined by acceleration, so this baby is the quickest car around.Originally Posted by distress
There isn't any more proof of the CC doing 242 than the 962 doing 250. Neither of them have been tested. Anyway, if the 250mph top speed is accurate, name one car that's faster...........thought soOriginally Posted by distress
The 962 is a race car, and lacks the practiality and reliability of a road car. The CC has been filmed and radard doing 242, supposadly; didn't say it is accurate, but a few media sources are quotable..check Zero, Great Britian.Originally Posted by Sweeney921
Of course, from what I have read, the CC still can't match drivability with the McLaren F1. Can't seam to find any reviews on the CCR, because it uses a new engine and lag-free supercharger.
The wind that blows in the Andes.
Does that matter?Originally Posted by distress
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)