proven what? that they waste more fuel then planes?Originally Posted by jcp123
proven what? that they waste more fuel then planes?Originally Posted by jcp123
shr0olvl started this thread to get everyone riled up...and from what I see it's working He doesn't know the first thing about cars or driving, don't worry about the comparisons he makes.
jcp123 is into the 1/4 mile and crusing comfortably down the street. Which is very respectable. We all have different styles of driving I would give far more credit to his posts since he's shown to know what he's talking about.
"NEVER ALLOW SOMEONE TO BE YOUR PRIORITY, WHILE ALLOWING YOURSELF TO BE THEIR OPTION"
this thread is utterly ridiculous. first you ask which we would rather have, we answer, and then you just have to rebut. If you're not going to listen to us, don't ask. And also, if you're going to say one car is "faster" than another car, at least check the stats so you can back yourself up. I would take an evo over a cobra anyday, anytime, anywhere. guess why..........because it's WAYYYYYY "faster"!:
The seemingly only important stat to some people : 0-60 times
1999 Ford Mustang Cobra SVT: 5.4
1999 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VI: 4.9
2004 Ford Mustang Cobra: just under 5 seconds
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO VIII MR FQ-400: 3.5
those are pretty substantial time differences
Yeah, i guess jcp and taz are right. Sorry jcp, i retract my previous statement about how handling should matter to everyone.
badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger
No prob, bob, I know we all get impassioned about our cars I know I've been known to do the same in the past.Originally Posted by d-quik
An it harm none, do as ye will
Approximately 79% of statistics are made up.
Can open, worms everywhere.Originally Posted by shr0olvl
Thanks for all the fish
Have you seen what kinda mileage new muscle gets? Close to 30 on the freeway, that's not bad IMHO.Originally Posted by KnifeEdge_2K1
I prefer classic muscle and yes, they use a lot of gas - but no more than SUV's these days, and quite a few of the vaunted supercars...
When I said proven, I meant that they can go a solid 100k miles without blown head gaskets, etc...they take a lickin and keep on tickin. I'm not saying that EVO's won't last, but they haven't proven themselves as of yet, and based on the things I've been hearing so far, their longevity isn't looking too promising.
Last edited by jcp123; 11-12-2004 at 10:21 PM.
An it harm none, do as ye will
Approximately 79% of statistics are made up.
Well, if import means not rice, then imports.
Rockefella says:
pat's sister is hawt
David Fiset says:
so is mine
David Fiset says:
do want
And does that make an NSX a POS? Come on man, you are making a fool out of yourself in this thread.Originally Posted by shr0olvl
I'd take both, how about that??
If someone offered me any of the following:
Shelby GT350
AC Cobra 427
Corvette Stingray 427
Falcon Phase 3 GTHO
Monaro GTS 350
E49 Charger
Hemi Cuda 426
FPV GT-P
FPV F6 Typhoon
HSV GTS Coupe
HSV Clubsport R8
Mazda RX-8
Honda NSX
Toyota Supra
Lancer EVO 8
Impreza WRX STi
350Z
........i'd be as happy as a pig in shit
I am the Stig
I concur with above response, Particularly the Supra
Seriously though, each unto his own.
i would take a RZ-S Supra over a Stang any day.
The Datto will rage again...
And like I said, there's Japanese cars I like too - the Datsun 510 and 240/260Z foremost among them, but the early Celicas and Mazda rotaries are also fun little cars I hear - though the Mazdas do tend to have longevity issues that hadn't been reslved yet.
My complaint is that, since I don't like new cars, it's hard to find decent Japanese cars that aren't fuel injected or subject to emissions laws. They hadn't advanced quite so far yet in adjusting to the American market; couple that with my liking for bigger, touring or GT oriented cars, and you can see the dilemma.
Last edited by jcp123; 11-12-2004 at 11:13 PM.
An it harm none, do as ye will
Approximately 79% of statistics are made up.
*sigh*
well, if were talking about all imports, in general, then I'd choose them. but if we're talking about a muscle car in the grand old american tradition versus a hopped up honda civic with a big goofy wing, you can bet I'd prefer that muscle car.
come on, that's just common sense, something ricers lack.
but that theres comparing the epitome of muscle cars to the low point of imports, why not compare the best of both....
I am the Stig
and yea... i'd take a 67 gt500 over anything japan has to offer
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)