Originally Posted by
Guibo
Uh, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt but in case you missed it (as it seems you have), I was talking about the Autocar test results at Rockingham, done under identical conditions (unlike in your NRing example where opposite ends of the 'Ring can have drastic changes even at the same exact time):
...
eg ... with a "little experience" it would be obvious that a modern track like Rockingham places very little "uncertainty" to the vehicle dynamics. There are no undulations in corners, no indentations, no height, no off-camber. So NO real test of the suspension compliance in the real world where all of htose exist. ie very little that tests SUSPENSION 
Those tests are the equivalent of slaom tests etc. Yes, gives a NUMBER but the vairation that the impact of the REAL outside world roads measn it can by easily reversed in terms of results.
THAT is called "experience" that no amount of close-minded, mag-masturbation can provide
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
Reply With Quote