Acura rsx type s vs mitsubishi lancer evo viii

[narb]

opinions....

[KnifeEdge_2K1]

this is a joke thread right? the evo would own the type s any day of the week

[LTT]

Absolutly no contest. Evo in every way.

[deffenbaugh03]

Since the Evo is 4WD and the RSX is FWD and underpowered, i would definitely pick the Evo, but i do prefer the RSX's looks to the Evo's. However i still love the Evo's styling.

[Sweeney921]

EVO hands down

[Cotterik]

evo owns all in its price range. period.

[Quiggs]

RSX + Turbo + LSD = more fun and better everyday car.

[Manik]

Not a very fair comparison the Evo can waste the RSX!

[KnifeEdge_2K1]

RSX + Turbo + LSD = more fun and better everyday car.

dude how much crack have you been doing, its fwd and its pretty much already at the limit of how much power it can put down, a turbo will only make it harder to drive round a track and a lil bit faster in the straits

the original integras already had lsds i think they were torsens and i think the rsx has em too

[KnifeEdge_2K1]

turbo lag + vtec lag (woot i made a new word) = hell

[Quiggs]

Regardless of the Evo being quicker/faster/better handling, it has a much rougher ride, which is something I wouldn't want in a daily driven car. It's also very uninspiring to sit in. It looks cheap. I like the layout of the RSX more. There's more to life than quarter miles and skidpad numbers.

And 200hp is not anywhere near the limit of the RSX motor.

[KnifeEdge_2K1]

Regardless of the Evo being quicker/faster/better handling, it has a much rougher ride, which is something I wouldn't want in a daily driven car. It's also very uninspiring to sit in. It looks cheap. I like the layout of the RSX more. There's more to life than quarter miles and skidpad numbers.

And 200hp is not anywhere near the limit of the RSX motor.

not the motor u crack head the drivetrain

you cant put out much in a fwd otherwise its just gonna slip
the rsx is rougher then a normal car and neither of these cars would be my first second or third choice for a daily driver, and as for the evo being cheap its kidna the point, a bare bones pocket rocket that can be had for way less then cars which are just as if not less fast.

[hec16]

Guess my answer pls..................................EVO!
________
Roll Blunts

[forza_autodelta]

for me too

[Quiggs]

not the motor u crack head the drivetrain

you cant put out much in a fwd otherwise its just gonna slip
the rsx is rougher then a normal car and neither of these cars would be my first second or third choice for a daily driver, and as for the evo being cheap its kidna the point, a bare bones pocket rocket that can be had for way less then cars which are just as if not less fast.

And I'd rather have the RSX, be it for a daily driver/weekend warrior. Go over to Honda-Tech, there's a lot of people with 300 horsepower and up Type-S' and I haven't heard any complaints about drivetrain problems.