Yes thats right, the new TT is a totally new car and not based on any golf. It might not be the best sportscar but it looks a LOT better then the cayman whitch just looks like another 911 with a different back.Originally Posted by johnnyperl
Porsche Cayman S
Audi TT 3.2 Quattro
Yes thats right, the new TT is a totally new car and not based on any golf. It might not be the best sportscar but it looks a LOT better then the cayman whitch just looks like another 911 with a different back.Originally Posted by johnnyperl
Last edited by quattro_20v; 08-15-2006 at 07:38 AM.
Imo the cayman is way better looking.Originally Posted by quattro_20v
The Cayman, because it looks like a mini-911 and its performance is just under that of its older brother The TT is more of a style-centered car than a performance oriented car to me.
- IS250fied -
The cayman S is actually about as fast as a base 911Originally Posted by fa22_raptor
I didn't know there was a new TT out already... I was talking about this one:
Which is a Golf in fancy panties.
And according to Porsche, the Cayman is not a Boxster coupé... they are completely different cars...
Ya right.
And 6'bore- in 1996/7, the 996 was an entire redesign. New water-cooled engine, different suspension, different shape overall. It was deemed more of a grand tourer than previous 911's. The new 997 is just an update, and who cares anyway? We're talking about the Cayman vs. the TT, not the 911.
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum...ad.php?t=24635Originally Posted by IWantAnAudiRS6
Bugger. That jumped under the radar...Originally Posted by The_Canuck
The Cayman would be more than just a little bit faster on track. It also has a lot of trunk space (14 cu. ft.) so it is actually quite useful for the two people it can carry. Also the Cayman has been praised for being easy to drive both at normal speeds and quickly.Originally Posted by johnnyperl
have you seen the cayman trunk? it is not useful at all. It is basically a very high platform above the engine. If you put any bags there you cant see out. Though i should say that i havent seen the front trunk which may be better.Originally Posted by aNOBLEman
If i lived in california id take the cayman, but i live in Oregon. I bike and ski. The TT is cool becaue you can have a "sports car" that can handle all conditions. IMO the TT is closer to a mini-911 Turbo or C4 than the caymen is to the 911.
But the TT is way slower then either, and for the last time, the Cayman is as fast, if not faster then the base 911.Originally Posted by johnnyperl
This is a poll not a race, I dont care if the cayman is faster.Originally Posted by The_Canuck
Yes, I have seen the trunk and it is quite useful as most hatchback's trunks are. If you can't see out the back use your side mirrors, it's not that hard. You could probably fit skis in there and I don't think you could fit a bike in either car.Originally Posted by johnnyperl
Still people keep saying its slower so i was getting a little annoyed , How do you think the Audi TT is like a 911 tubo? AWD? Although ill admit the TT is more practical...the Cayman is just so cool! Imo cooler then the 911...Originally Posted by johnnyperl
The new TT really doesnt appeal to me design wise. Driving wise it doesnt stand a chance against a RWD porsche .
Well, the 3.2 quattro version does 0-60 in 5,9 seconds now and was 6.5. They made it quite a lot lighter, the 2.0 turbo fwd is just as quick as the previous 3.2 V6 version.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)