Originally Posted by
IBrake4Rainbows
I've had a major argument with MoSpoNerd about the newness criteria, Slick. I have to say the inclusion of the Falcon was probably an edge decision - meaning it could have gone either way.
Rather than incurring the wrath of Australia, they erred on the side of "Why not?"
I just don't think it's a new enough car, personally. the point of the newness test was to either change significantly dimensions of the vehicle or include major chassis/drivetrain revisions. The FG does neither over the BF.
Yes lobster.. But I'd go on body as much as drivetrain. And atleast this time over the BA we have seen a change exterior wise.. All be it drivetrain is similarly same with upgrades. New front end steering but basically the same package. That new feel should be there as long as you dont look to long at the mondeo your fine.
But it does question the sportwagon going on VZ to this. We cold argue the same thing but holden didnt need another car in the field.
"Just a matter of time i suppose"
"The elevator is broke, So why don't you test it out"
"I'm not trapped in here with all of you, Your all trapped in here with me"