Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: viper/gallardo/sl55AMG

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328

    viper/gallardo/sl55AMG

    A german magazine (Auto-Bild) produced a comparative test between the SRT-10, the Gallardo and the SL55-AMG. The Gallardo came out first and some figures/results are interesting to reproduce here

    SRT-10: 8.3 litre, 711NM/4250 torque, 506 BHP/5600, 0-100 4.8 secs, top speed 306 kmph, test consumption 20.8 litres per 100 km., test weight 1585 kg's. Price 105000 euro

    Gallardo: 5.0 litre, 510NM/4500, 500 BHP/7800, 0-100 4.5 secs, top speed 309 kmph, test consumption 18.7 litres per 100 km, test weight 1640 kg's, price 148480 euro.

    SL: 5.5 litre, 700 NM/2750, 500 BHP/6100 0-100 4.7 secs(autobox), top speed 250 kph, (governed), test consumption 17.7 litres per 100 km, test weight 2010 kg's;price 126556 euro.

    So what can we conclude: The Viper with the biggest engine and the lowest weight cannot keep up with the Gallardo, and not even with the Benz, although its 400 kg's heavier. It will take the most fuel of all three, but can only take 70 litre, forcing you to refuel every 300 km or so. The Benz recorded fuel consumption is probably less because it was not tested to the topspeeds of the other two because it is governed.
    Although the price of the Viper is 50% lower than the Gallardo, and 25% lower than the Benz, the German magazine observed that it's behaviour is so tricky especially under wintery or wet conditions (there is no ESP) that you would better be advised to use it between april and october. (It would save you some road tax too).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Northampton, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    7,989
    I think they missed the point of the Viper... It's not supposed to get good gas mileage. It's not supposed to have traction control. It's supposed to be able to have wheelspin in 3rd gear. And that's not really what Europeans are looking for in a car.
    Personally, I'd rather have the Viper than either of the others. If you have the money to buy one of those cars, you have the money to put gas in it.
    [O o)O=\x/=O(o O]

    The things we do for girls who won't sleep with us.

    Patrick says:
    dads is too long so it wont fit
    so i took hers out
    and put mine in

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    3,259
    most definatly the Gallardo. it has the quickest 0 - 100 and highest top speed of the three and I love its styling far more than that of the viper or SL

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    CALGARY
    Posts
    1,578
    even though i like the Viper the most out of the three, i'd want the SL55 AMG the most because of it's everyday driveability and quality.
    Wenn Sie wissen wollen, was einen volkswagen ein volkswagen macht, treibt es.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Behind You
    Posts
    191
    I'd take the Benz as an everyday car, but if I was given the choice of taking a weekend get-away/personal car I'd probably take the Gallardo.
    Auto-Bild should of tested the Benz and Gallardo with the new Ford GT, that car would be better suited to be compared and compete with the Lamborghini Gallardo and the Mercedes-Benz SL 55 AMG.

    From all that I've heard and read, the Gallardo is one kickass car. GO LAMBO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Quiggs
    I think they missed the point of the Viper... It's not supposed to get good gas mileage. It's not supposed to have traction control. It's supposed to be able to have wheelspin in 3rd gear. And that's not really what Europeans are looking for in a car.
    Personally, I'd rather have the Viper than either of the others. If you have the money to buy one of those cars, you have the money to put gas in it.
    Gas is increasingly becoming a problem when you have to pay 1.5 US$ per litre. The magazine also mentioned that even with ESP shut off, it was very difficult to make the Gallardo twist its tail. The point of having wheel spin in 3rd gear escapes me. Its not the most efficient way to move forward. Why need all that power if the drive train cannot transfer that into forward motion?
    What really surprised me was the fact that despite having the lowest weight, the Viper was the slowest car, certainly compared to the much heavier Benz.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    I'll take a Gallardo. As underwhelming as its looks first appeared to me, it's actually grown on me. Oh yeah, and it totally blows away both the Viper and the SL55. Heck, you can't even buy an SL55 with a manual transmission...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Halifax, Canada
    Posts
    1,584

    Sl 55

    i will probaby pick the SL. i just love this car and im a big fan of mercedes benz, especially //AMGs. it is also superior in term of drivability and reliability. as for the viper, i dont think its really comparable to these cars. its a bit different if u think of it.

    also someone mentioned the ford gt40, actually car & driver compared that car to the porsche GT3 and the ferrari 360 challenge stradale. beleive it or not ,they chose the ford as the winner! maybe coz theyre american or maybe coz its really better but i just cant beleive it.
    ----R.I.P----
    "Misho Ratio"
    2003 - 2004

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    1,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Egg Nog
    you can't even buy an SL55 with a manual transmission...
    Must know more about SL55.........Transmission: 5-Speed Manu-Matic

    http://www.fast-autos.net/mercedes/mercedessl55.html

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Halifax, Canada
    Posts
    1,584
    Quote Originally Posted by SL500
    Must know more about SL55.........Transmission: 5-Speed Manu-Matic

    http://www.fast-autos.net/mercedes/mercedessl55.html
    ok, that makes what hew said true !! u cant get it with a manual tranny. coz a manuamatic isnt a manual !!
    ----R.I.P----
    "Misho Ratio"
    2003 - 2004

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    Quote Originally Posted by SL500
    Must know more about SL55.........Transmission: 5-Speed Manu-Matic
    If there's only two pedals on the floor, it's not a manual With those silly semi-automatics, to a proper extent you can't even select your own gears, but rather just when to change them...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    1,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Egg Nog
    If there's only two pedals on the floor, it's not a manual With those silly semi-automatics, to a proper extent you can't even select your own gears, but rather just when to change them...
    You can change your gear on the steering wheel,like a ferrari,that isnt enough?
    Last edited by SL500; 12-24-2003 at 09:51 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    Quote Originally Posted by SL500
    You can change your gear on the steering wheel,like a ferrari,that isnt enough?
    There's no clutch! You need a clutch! That little third pedal to the left of the brake!

    With steering wheel paddles, you can only switch up and down. You could never do a 4-2 downshift for a corner. Anyways, I know Ferrari's system is faster than anyone could possibly do by hand, by I really think I'd just prefer a manual.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    1,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Egg Nog
    There's no clutch! You need a clutch! That little third pedal to the left of the brake!

    With steering wheel paddles, you can only switch up and down. You could never do a 4-2 downshift for a corner. Anyways, I know Ferrari's system is faster than anyone could possibly do by hand, by I really think I'd just prefer a manual.
    Yes,i like manual,too,but that works really fast for you(to change the gears),not?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    Quote Originally Posted by SL500
    Yes,i like manual,too,but that works really fast for you(to change the gears),not?
    I don't get the pleasure of driving from how quickly gears can be shifted. It's the clutch, the lever positions, and everything... As I said:

    Quote Originally Posted by Egg Nog
    Anyways, I know Ferrari's system is faster than anyone could possibly do by hand, by I really think I'd just prefer a manual.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •