Enthusiast
okay, today someone told me there was a skyline that was faster then the McLaren F1, i didnt believe it, turns out that this skyline was quicker then the F1(which really isnt a feat), the Enzo, CGT, ect
there is a difference between fast and quick, top speed and consistant speed increase/ accel~questioable top speed
my question is, which would you prefer? a fast car or a quick car
pondering things
Super Moderator
Quick. I'd prefer the acceleration. And, how often do you hit max speed around a track? (Not counting large ovals or straight-biased tracks like La Sarthe.
Rockefella says:
pat's sister is hawt
David Fiset says:
so is mine
David Fiset says:
do want
Fanatic
A balance of both. Right now I've got neither.
[O o)O=\x/=O(o O]
The things we do for girls who won't sleep with us.
Patrick says:
dads is too long so it wont fit
so i took hers out
and put mine in
Enthusiast
nice work on the sigOriginally Posted by Quiggs
pondering things
Super Moderator
That's true, would be nice to floor it on a strip or empty highway (w/ safety of course.)
Rockefella says:
pat's sister is hawt
David Fiset says:
so is mine
David Fiset says:
do want
Enthusiast
Quick - the Mclaren F1 is the perfect mix between the 2 though .. because its excellent at both. Of course .. id prefer something that corners quickly more than I want something that accelerates quickly .. its much easier to feel G force through corners, which is something I love very very much
Enthusiast
Quick - Its what I wanted to go for in my frist car (Obviously I didn't get it lol) but as Rockefella said, how often can you cruise up to 150+ or whatever? I like to break off the line and beat the other car in the merge lane.
Fanatic
quick definitely, i mean come on how many times are you going to reach 240mph compared to the amount of times you experience extreme g-forces pulling out of your driveway?
Enthusiast
Quick!
the stock 2.5L (US) STi is quicker to 40 than an Enzo
Enthusiast
Yeah if you threw off a cliff J/K
I like exige idea of the mcLaren but what about the Koinsneggajsdhdaj(sp)
.................................................................................:¦Back Again¦:.................................................................................
Enthusiast
personally id take the Mclaren because of more seats, more space, better sound .. but same principle really, excellent at bothYeah if you threw off a cliff J/K
I like exige idea of the mcLaren but what about the Koinsneggajsdhdaj(sp
Enthusiast
like Quiggs siad earlier Sort of a blend, I want my car to have amazing acceleration but also have a high top speed. But most cars that have the amazing powerful engines are both Fast and Quick. The engine can excell the car forward fast and can get the car to amazingly fast speeds.
My Photography: flickr.com/photos/a-m-photo/
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."
Super Moderator
Quick every time for the reasons stated, how often can you get it up to 'fast' and can afford the tyres to run safely at 200+
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
Enthusiast
well, i think quck swept it
pondering things
Enthusiast
Quick. I really enjoy the ability to accelerate to speed out of a corner, much more then going fast. Also, if you have a high top speed, but crap acceleration, the wait to get to a high speed after a turn will kill you.
Quick. Defititely quick.
"I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring" - Richard Feynman, last recorded words.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote