i am sure this has been brought up before, but why can we not place any pic's, quotes, cannot underline, bold, or italicize anything in our sigs?
i am sure this has been brought up before, but why can we not place any pic's, quotes, cannot underline, bold, or italicize anything in our sigs?
pondering things
wow nice title of the thread
He came dancing across the water
With his galleons and guns
Looking for the new world
In that palace in the sun
On the shore lay Montezuma
With his cocoa leaves and pearls
Ive seen wars started in certain forums because of the ability of using pictures in sigs. Personally I think it makes the forums much cleaner and much more attractive without sig pics. Some forums i use like GTA forums really has alot of hassle with sigs and stuff. Although i see no reason why we shouldnt be able to use bold, italics etc. Maybe because no HTML tags are allowed at all to ensure theres no use of pictures .. i dunno.Originally Posted by targa
yeah and say i posted something like this, then the line under the post
______________________
then my pic: PIC TAKES THIIIS MUCH SPACE
Don't bother me, I'm probably working while posting...
UCP's biggest...oh man...i got nothin'
The thing is, you have no idea how anoying that looks.Originally Posted by CHEESE-TACULAR
Rockefella says:
pat's sister is hawt
David Fiset says:
so is mine
David Fiset says:
do want
that was my point: to show how annoying a picture for a signature would beOriginally Posted by Rockefella
Don't bother me, I'm probably working while posting...
UCP's biggest...oh man...i got nothin'
i figured the pic thing....it takes an ass long time for loading with sig pics
but the bolding, italics, and underlining shouldnt cause a prob, as with the quote thing...
pondering things
The only one I would like to have is links. I don't care about any of that other stuff.
but with that power people could adverise other websites/products and isnt that against the rules or something?Originally Posted by carlover
Don't bother me, I'm probably working while posting...
UCP's biggest...oh man...i got nothin'
Mods can ban people or alter signatures so I don't think it would become a problem.Originally Posted by CHEESE-TACULAR
_____________
Go here to get a free PSP!!! http://www.a;oesia;aghahugalhlwgui.c...memoneyfoo.com
You sig carlover is the BEST EXAMPLE of why we shoudl NOT allow too much.You've taken it to the max, so one line response from you takes up have the fecking screen
Back to ignore sigs for me then
Q: What MATTERS in a forum ?
Choice A : the repeated smart sigs and pics
Choice B : the big sigs that repeat old jokes and taglines
Choice C : the content of the POST
For all who chose A or B, WHY ?
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
because it's kinkyOriginally Posted by Matra et Alpine
Sh*t. Busted. Alright I changed it.Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
thats so incredibly wrongOriginally Posted by r1ckst4
The Datto will rage again...
One of UCP's best forum features is the ability to turn signatures off. I've been avoiding screen-filling crap for the past year or so
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)