Originally Posted by
spi-ti-tout
National competition - the brands on the face of the world, as set nearly a century (or more) ago!
Spi, you picked up on ALL the wrong points
The remionder on ownershipand multinational was coz you called Damiler/Chrysler AMERICAN
Matra you n00b, what the hell do you think I put double-inverted commas there for?
coz you didnt' beleive but some people DO ?
hence the clarification perhaps ????
It seemed odd that the sentence opened with the surpsise of being beaten. erm it's down to quality for the price
Alright - the GM car industry
Just HOW many brands do GM have under their roof?
IF you split GM up then platform sharing becomes very diffcult. Sharing design experience and patents become a COSTLY nightmare.
So you'd end up with 6 inadequately funded development and design houses and all failing to deliver global cars.
What DOES seem to be missing from GM is any real leadership in design across the board. So too may similar and common deliverables rather than ensuring breadth they just seem to populate the spots more densely and as you say "boring" (generally). BUT most folks dont' mind boring as long as it's cheap and efficient - but I'm not sure they hit those buttons either
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'