This is most nonsense thread ever...
This is most nonsense thread ever...
Money can't buy you friends, but you do get a better class of enemy.
who resurected this post?
stop no more!!
TVR, Heres to Peter wheeler and his last creationg of the Scamander.
Coventry seriously sucks....
BAR is trying for 400 km/h
veyron may beat the f1 car!
But... only the bugatti can walks in the street hheheheh
they veyron has about 10 cows worth of leather in it so definitely, the F1 car wins.
F1 cars will win anyday. A 1999 Jordan (so not the best in 1999....and technology has advanced) would accelerate from standstill to 100MPH and back to standstill in under 5seconds. They Veryon cannot get to 100 in under 5secs.
F1 car wins acceleration & braking then.
Bugatti can do 251 with a long enough straight
F1 car could do 280mph (BAR Boneville Car...and I know its "not a normal F1 car" but F1 cars on a circuit are setup at a compromise...the Veryon will never find a single road long enough to do 251 on unless its an oval proving ground...so its all fair here)
F1 car wins top speed
And and F1 car generates more than 3G in corners...Bugatti could not do that, it cannot have tht sort of grip & downforce. I'm guessing at it having the ability to pull up to 2G in corners.
So f1 car wins on grip.
And F1 car is also setup to be responsive whereas the Bugatti is a sports/comfort comprise so F1 wins Handling.
So....F1 wins Accel. Brakes, Top Speed grip & handling.
F1 car wins overall.
i dun think it s fair comparison, cuz look at the weight of the 2 cars n ofcourse Bugatti needs more powerfull engine. And I agree with Matra Et Alpine that F1 cars arent Aerodynamically set for oval tracks.
Originally Posted by LPFAN
Just call me Tom
Please visit www.tomranson.com and make me feel loved.
Absolute nonsense comparison...
Check the BBC show "Top Gear" The Maserati MC12 ran 1:18.9 around their test track, the fastest road car they've tested (beating its cousin the Ferrari Enzo by one tenth). The Renault F1 lapped their track (in the wettt!) and posted )0:59.0 with the same driver. Is the Veyron really a full twenty seconds faster arounf the Top Gear track? I think not.
Last edited by jump15vc; 01-13-2006 at 02:02 PM.
[QUOTE=jump15vc]thabks for that poor quote and lack of explanation!Originally Posted by McReis
Edit:Take it back, sorry!
Last edited by Jakg; 01-13-2006 at 01:58 PM.
Imran the whole point of an F1 car is to be the fastest possible around a track.
Check out the show "Top Gear" on BBC a Maserati ran the fastest road car lap at 1:18.9 and the Renault F1 did it in 0:59.0. Same driver. Is the Bugatti a full 20 sec faster than the Maserati(the Enzo did it in 1:19.0 and the Zonda C12S didnt break 1:20). I Think not.
R u serious the veyron has a 3,000lb wieght penalty on with less than 50 bhp on the F1, considering reports that ferrari and Mclaren were closing in on 1,000 bhp with the 3L V10. The F1 also produces more than 3g in cornering and accelerates from 0-100mph and back in under six seconds. The F1 produces so much more downforce that the Veyron would be left in the dust in a straight up race around the 'Ring or any other real track for that matter. The Veyron may have a higher top speed than the F1 in a track set up but it would have no chance in reality.Originally Posted by Cadillac Imaj
the "shanghai specials" were reputed to have 1,100 HpOriginally Posted by jump15vc
stop wasting website space and talk about something useful. GOSH!! What idiots!!
Edit: Who's seen Nepolian Dynamite lol!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)