Again - trying to compare F1 with NASCAR?Originally Posted by SolidStradale
No point.
They are completely different sports, with different goals, requirements and rules.
An F1 driver only has to flick his finger to change gear because a rather large number of people spent a very long time and an awful lot of money so that the gear change could take 0.05s, rather than 0.5s, not because he is "lazy"...
The Pit crew only have to change 4 nuts because the rules allow it, and that is the fastest way to do it.
Do you seriously think that if the NASCAR rules allowed, they would not also be using paddle-shift transmissions, airjacks and single nuts per wheel?
NASCAR is Entertainment.
It is easy to watch -
There aren't huge volumes of complicated, intricate rules, and technologies that need to be understood.
The track doesn't wander off behind some trees, so the paying public can't miss a vital part of the "action".
And there is "action" by the bucket-load.
Lets face it - without the changes of lead and the closeness of racing NASCAR would be less interesting than watching grass grow.
So, NASCAR is controlled to keep things close and exciting so that thousands of fans can pay their money, watch a race and are guaranteed some sort of entertainment.
The races are 4 hrs long for no other reason than that it makes a proper afternoon out of it. Pleanty of time to drink beer and wave foam fingers around.
F1 is a Sport.
It is about technology and skill, be it the skill of the driver, or the skill of the guy who designed the new barge-boards which make the car 0.001s per lap faster...
The teams do not want "excitement" and "action"; they want their car in front from start to finish, and they will spend vast sums of money to make that happen.
The fans do not get a look in, the racing is not for their enjoyment. I suspect it probably was long ago, but now it is a corperate display of power; who can afford to hire the best people to make the best cars and the best drivers to drive them.
The fans are only there so that the teams can point out to advertisers / investors that lots of people watch F1, because I doubt Vodaphone would spend $40 million a year for cars to go round an empty track.
There is no "excitement".
The drivers and most of the crew are about as interesting as a radio show for deaf people. Have you ever seen a post race interview?
All of the fans are tedious bores as well, eagerly awaiting the newest revisions to the brake ducts. "Oooo! how exciting! The Renault has a new front wing endplate set at 5 degrees, rather than 4.75 degrees!!!"
The only people having fun are the ones being entertained by corperate sponsors, and that's only because they are getting free helicopter rides and champagne...
So, in summary:
NASCAR - something to keep "the masses" happy on a sunday afternoon; quick, cheap and uncomplicated
F1 - Corperate chest-beating followed by geeks who pretend to know how an extra slot in a rear wing helps downforce; long, boring and expensive.