Originally Posted by
werty
You would eat with the criminal before you shook hands with the guy trying to stop him.
Wrong and how absurd.
I would try to do BOTH ! By doing so prevent illegal acts by both.
You're assertion is not relevant to the discussion other than scoring a point. WHich it has failed to do, but IS a nice coin of phrase
If you are unwiling to do both then you have only one side and THAT may be wrong. Remember all the founding fathers were criminals !!!!
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'