Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 40

Thread: Maserati Quattroporte faster than the E60 M5?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,687
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4
    could be, but maybe the balance of the car is not so good?
    M5's weight repartition is 51/49, as far as I remember

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Piacki_117
    M5's weight repartition is 51/49, as far as I remember
    May be that is not good
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Posts: 30,245
    Posts
    7,352
    the quattroporte is absolutely amazing in person, its a gorgeous car especially in black. You realise that after you've been up close to it. Photos do it no justice atall, the fact is that its a beatiful peice of italian engineering. You also realise that theres no contest between that and the m5 when considering a purchase. For what its built for, it beats the bimmer in almost every way.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    isnt it all about west virginia?
    Posts
    1,927
    GO HENK!!! :d
    badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    328
    So, the M5 is more of a drifter than the Maserati!

    Works for me
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    1,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Piacki_117
    M5's weight repartition is 51/49, as far as I remember
    You cannot judge a car's performance around a track by judging only numbers like weight distribution etc. These numbers show which car is LIKELY to be faster. The faster car tough is only proven on the race track.

    Maybe the track is very tight and the power advantage of the M5 becomes a dsadvantage.

    By the way, the E60 M5 is the last generation M5? Not sure about it....

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by d-quik
    GO HENK!!! :d
    I am about to go to bed if that is what you mean
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  8. #23
    Guest Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Klemmel
    So, the M5 is more of a drifter than the Maserati!

    Works for me
    when im on a mountain road going round a hairpin to fast, do i want to understeer of the edge or spin it off the road (and the cliff!)

    Quote Originally Posted by lightweight
    By the way, the E60 M5 is the last generation M5? Not sure about it....
    It Is

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,697
    I always used to think the M5 would have beat the Maserati around a track, but thanks for correcting me.
    2011 Honda Civic Si

    ATHEIST and damn proud of it.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    781
    I thought that the M5 would have been quicker but even if it was I would still prefer the Quattroporte. Like Cotterik said, pictures do not do it justice, it's one of the most beautiful cars in production right now imo. It sounds amazing, and I love the interior. I'm glad to see it performs well too.
    My other signature has a V12

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    no amount of speed can compensate for the M5's hideous looks.
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    6,369
    I would have to drive them both to decide. I am not a big fan of the flappy F1 gearbox on the Quattroporte.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    isnt it all about west virginia?
    Posts
    1,927
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4
    I am about to go to bed if that is what you mean
    No, henk4, that is not what I, d-quik, meant.
    badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,697
    Quote Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan
    I would have to drive them both to decide. I am not a big fan of the flappy F1 gearbox on the Quattroporte.
    The M5 has the SMG transmission, so you're out of luck there too.
    2011 Honda Civic Si

    ATHEIST and damn proud of it.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    6,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Vindesh17
    The M5 has the SMG transmission, so you're out of luck there too.
    Doesn't the BMW SMG gearbox have problems?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Maserati Quattroporte (V) 2004-2012
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 10-21-2010, 11:12 AM
  2. Hide-Out Index
    By Sauc3 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 02:43 AM
  3. Chrysler 300C vs Maserati Quattroporte
    By lfb666 in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-04-2004, 03:01 PM
  4. Future editions of Maserati Quattroporte
    By stemi in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-25-2003, 12:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •