Im sure there are other ways to go about saving your fish...
Im sure there are other ways to go about saving your fish...
Porsche!
Not against an efficient hunter like the seal !!Originally Posted by RazaBlade
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
I agree on all points. I'm against this practice 100%, but the point I was trying to make is; if it is continually being allowed to happen, then make it as humane as possible, find a use for whatever remains of the animal ( I suggested dog food, but I don't see a reason why the meat could not be marketed for human consumption). Someone mentioned that they are slaughtered to control the fish population, this may be so, but I thought the fur industry was the main cause ... I really don't know.Originally Posted by McReis
Another horrible practice, is the harvesting of shark fins .... almost as dispicable. I'm sure there are many other practices worldwide that just seem so wrong ..... moreso to us in our "so-called civilized society" where human life has little value to some people ... but we could save that topic for a different thread.
For me, its not just what they're doing, killing innocent often young animals, but its also the way they're doing it, savagely beating them. The original picture posted is horrific, that animal must have suffered an unbelievable amount of trauma to end up that way. If the Canadian Government is so adamant that it wants these seals killed, find proper ways of doing it. Putting them to sleep with darts, how hard can it be? Probably a lot easier than jumping from place to place with a golf club and beating it to death. I hate the double standards used by the people in power.
Porsche!
Just wondering about that excuse .. who 'owns' the fish population? Is it the water-dwelling seals etc, or land-bound humans including big-business fisheries?Originally Posted by RacingManiac
As fish are the seal's sole food source, the balance of nature is more than capable of controlling seal population, isn't it? Even so, if effective control of herd population is the rationale for the cull then the breeders should be 'attended' to, not the (continually occuring) offspring. So its pretty clear where the real motivation lies for this barbaric 'population control'
I agree with McReis' sentiments - well said. Other species have as much right to dignity and existence as we humans do, and we need to majorly control OUR population before we can presume to 'control' (or exterminate) theirs
Last edited by nota; 03-10-2006 at 04:10 PM.
thats gross (the killing)
poor seals
THIS IS A SIGNATURE
(UCP'S biggest Zonda fan)
Stand up next to a mountain, chop it down with the edge of my hand. Pick up all the peices make an island over there
Jimi H...
Humans 'own' the fish, they feed more humans than seals.
And I'm not talking about sterotyping in Australia.Originally Posted by Blue Supra
Just because your continent is half as big as my country doesn't mean you're going to sterotype the different regions as we do. In fact, it's more of a good thing you don't.
2007 Acura TL Type-S (AEM V2, R-V6 Race/J-Pipe, ATLP Quad Exhaust)
2011 BMW 328i Coupe
wtf would they do with all the seals anyway??
dont canadians have natural gas and cup o' noodles?!?
ffs.
UPC's most heavy Bawls drinker. :D
Australia only 'half as big as America' ?
"The land area of Australia is almost as great as that of the United States of America (excluding Alaska), about 50% greater than Europe (excluding the former USSR) and 32 times greater than the United Kingdom"
http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]?OpenDocum
Remeber in the TV interview in the streets on the we should bomb North Korea they were pointing to AustraliaOriginally Posted by nota
You expect to much from the education system. Be thankful that those in charge have marked up maps
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
maybe he meant population......
i dunno, but he was quoting an aussie who did say it was half as big........
You can call me scott.
I do remember & those were genuine 'walk up' interviews. Another good one was Kurgistan via cnnnn.com which has now morphed intoOriginally Posted by Matra et Alpine
http://www.chaser.com.au/content/view/1601/26/
http://www.chaser.com.au/content/blogsection/16/160/
.. Which is why I didn't quote him directlymaybe he meant population......
i dunno, but he was quoting an aussie who did say it was half as big........
Last edited by nota; 03-11-2006 at 11:38 AM.
^ that first link is gold
Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."
Originally Posted by RacingManiac
Many species that are killed that way are near extinction, and still being killed. Anyway, if the only objective was to avoid destroying fish population, why would they take their skin off like they did to the one on the photo? Don't be naif!
And I don't care what reason they claim or have. I just can't accept the violence with wich they are killed. Couldn't they be carried and killed the same way cows and pigs are killed to be at our tables? With dignity and no suffering?
Those who believe that there is an acceptable reason to justify the way this animals are violently and sadisticly killed, should make a check-up to their heads.
Last edited by McReis; 03-13-2006 at 02:59 AM.
Money can't buy you friends, but you do get a better class of enemy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)