Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Cylinder liner materials

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,560

    Cylinder liner materials

    I'm looking for some info on the pros and cons of the various cylinder liner materials in use.

    The ones I know of so far are:

    Aluminium (or unlined); Pro: Light, has the same expansion rate as the block, Con: Soft

    Iron (there must be several varieties here); Pros: Strong, easily made, durable, Cons: Heavy, expansion rate needs careful design

    Nikasil; Pros: Strong, light, durable, Cons: cost

    Beryllium; Pros: very light, Cons: Cost, toxicity.

    Beryllium has only been used (to my knowledge) in the Ilmore F1 engines till it was banned and Nikasil is much more popular for bikes than cars.

    All other information would be greatly appreciated, Thanks
    Chief of Secret Police and CFO - Brotherhood of Jelly
    No Mr. Craig, I expect you to die! On the inside. Of heartbreak. You emo bitch

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552
    In the mid-90s BMW introduced their V8 engines, they originally had Alusil liners. The Aluminum/Silicone liners didn't fare well with the high-Sulfur gasolines in the US and caused cylinder liner erosion, and subsequent loss of compression. This lead BMW to replace many of those early V8s with Nikasil liner-ed engines. So in your list of materials, I think unlined engines would also be suspect to bad fuel, unless the entire block is made of a corrosion resistant alloy.
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 3 cylinder engines
    By KnifeEdge_2K1 in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-12-2004, 06:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •