Brad,
This is the claim on your website that pi**ed off a lot of engineers, because they hate seeing people claiming to cheat science.
For the power output to be the same, but one engine to have 3 times the torque, that engine must also then produce that torque at 1/3 of the rpm.The power output is similar to a conventional engine, but given that the significant improvement in torque output is almost three times that of a conventional engine
This is not open for arguement, it is the laws of physics / engineering / science.
The point is an engine that produces 3 times the torque at 1/3 the rpm is NOT better than the engine it is compared against. If you produce 50kW you produce 50kW. All it means is the engine that produces the 3xtorque at 1/3rpm must be geared 3 times higher to be capable of achieving the same vehicle speeds. If this is done the acceleration of both will be the same.
That also cannot be argued. So us engineers have said the marketing is misleading, because it doesn't tell the general population that 3 times the torque at 1/3 the rpm is NOT any better. It is just different.
From what you have said above, the revetec now gears up the output shaft 3:1. Therefore this 3xtorque has now been reduced to 1xtorque, and the 1/3rpm has been increased to 1xrpm. So with the 3:1 gearing the rpms, torques and powers are now comparable to a conventional engine. This is what I and others have been saying the whole way along.
You have to realise that when the general public (and the first 6 pages of this thread) read your marketing documents, they think your engine is 300% more efficient / better than a conventional engine - which is not correct.