The Latest installment of Ferrari Vs Lambo, V12 v V12
BHP 640
Weight 1665
0-100 3.4
0-200 10.8
BHP 612
Weight 1690
0-100 3.7
0-200 11
Ferrari 599
Lambo LP640
The Latest installment of Ferrari Vs Lambo, V12 v V12
BHP 640
Weight 1665
0-100 3.4
0-200 10.8
BHP 612
Weight 1690
0-100 3.7
0-200 11
http://www.s8.createphpbb.com/carworldforum/index.php?mforum=carworldforum
looking for members and mods
I'll take the Murci.
Rockefella says:
pat's sister is hawt
David Fiset says:
so is mine
David Fiset says:
do want
LP640 hands down
Weekly Quote -
Dick
Under normal circumstances, I would have said Lambo hands down too. But, bought this weeks Autocar, where they high-speed tested 9 supercars. Their figures are as follows:
Lambo LP640:
0-62 (100km/h) -- 3.4
0-124 (200) -- 11.2
0-186 (300) -- 31.8
Top Speed -- 211mph
Ferrari 599
0-62 (100) -- 3.5
0-124 (200) -- 10.3
0-186 (300) -- 29.9
Top Speed -- 208
They said apart from the 4WD helping the Lambo off the line, the Ferrari "takes big chunks out of the Lambos lead as speed increases". Also, they said the Ferrari feels stable at top speed, whereas the Lambo was a handful, with a lack of stability at the back.
Only reason ive put this in, as it clearly seems the original comparison was performance based, so hope this info will help give a better judgement.....
Porsche!
when do you actually get a car that fast
lambo for presence, performance, and jaw dropping good looks while cruising.
Weekly Quote -
Dick
It took me 1 second to vote the Lambo. Which is the speed that I move my cursor over, clicked on it, and the time the browser took, to show me the results page confirming my vote was in.
p.s 599 looked abit gay next to murci
A green LP640 for me.
you can't compare the 2. LP640 is a mid engine and the 599 is a front engine. but if i had to, i'd take the lambo cuase it's beast like
Gone:
09 Ducati Monster 696
09 Audi Q5 3.2
03 Infiniti G35 Sedan
07 Honda Civic Coupe LX 5spd
Current:
10 BMW 335d
12 Audi Q5 2.0t
10 VW Jetta TDI
11 Ducati Monster 796
The 599 is mid engined.Originally Posted by coolieman1220
Thanks for all the fish
I'd have to take the LP640. I generally prefer Ferraris, but the 599 is just so ugly, though, I am sure they are both fantastic to drive.
Go n-ithe an cat thu, is go n-ithe an diabhal an cat
When you go Home, Tell them for us and say 'For your tommorrow, We Gave Our Today.'
Since when?Originally Posted by Coventrysucks
Rockefella says:
pat's sister is hawt
David Fiset says:
so is mine
David Fiset says:
do want
Originally Posted by Rockefella
since the engine is sitting behind the front axle
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams
I hate stupid details like that, the engine sits in front of the passengers.. which is what I took into account.Originally Posted by henk4
Oh, and you may want to have Wout edit the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano in the Database then, it's listed as Front-Engined.
Rockefella says:
pat's sister is hawt
David Fiset says:
so is mine
David Fiset says:
do want
Thanks for all the fish
Uh oh, we are all screwedOriginally Posted by Ultimatecarpage.com Guidelines
How can men use sex to get what they want?
Sex is what they want. - Frasier
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)