For me it's the other way round. It's how the photo looks that's important, if the subject is interesting - it gets better. But give me a perfect shot of a fork and a poor shot of an FXX and I'll go for the first at once.Originally Posted by Sauc3
Enthusiast
For me it's the other way round. It's how the photo looks that's important, if the subject is interesting - it gets better. But give me a perfect shot of a fork and a poor shot of an FXX and I'll go for the first at once.
It's not denial. I'm just very selective about the reality I accept.
Fanatic
I cant decide between the two.
There are good and bad points for both, but both are equally very good photos. This argument in photography is neverending. Photography is about subject, setup etc etc but at the end of the day its how the photo makes you feel personally that defines whether or not its successful in your eyes. Everyones eyes are different.
Super Moderator
How do you know all this wise stuff???
Are you related to drakkie???
The Special One
What? You didn't know?
Money can't buy you friends, but you do get a better class of enemy.
Enthusiast
He's drakkie's long lost twin brother. They were apparently separated at birth.How do you know all this wise stuff???
Are you related to drakkie???
It's not denial. I'm just very selective about the reality I accept.
The Special One
Like Bart Simpson and Hugo Simpson?
Money can't buy you friends, but you do get a better class of enemy.
Super Moderator
Quit pushing your sad story onto others Hugo!!!Like Bart Simpson and Hugo Simpson?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote