Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Zero Speed Automatics

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Carthage, MO. US
    Posts
    1,339

    Zero Speed Automatics

    I heard this term today and wondered what it meant. does it mean there are no gears? i thought all engines had gears?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by 70cuda88 View Post
    I heard this term today and wondered what it meant. does it mean there are no gears? i thought all engines had gears?
    I guess they were refering to CVT gearboxes. Which means continously variable transmision. The were invented by the dutchies, and from here someone with more technical knowledge than I will be able to explain how they work.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Posts
    4,708
    Quote Originally Posted by 70cuda88 View Post
    I heard this term today and wondered what it meant. does it mean there are no gears?
    Here is an article on CVT transmissions: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/cvt1.htm

    Quote Originally Posted by 70cuda88 View Post
    i thought all engines had gears?
    It's the transmition that has the gears, not the engine.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Carthage, MO. US
    Posts
    1,339
    engines and trani's as a whole is what i was reffering too

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Never heard the term.

    But taking the semantics of the phrase then I woudl suspect it refers to a transmission capable of providing torque at zero speed.

    So "old style" autos get it with a slush-box (torque convertor).
    Modern computer controlled autos manage slip of clutch plates.
    Not sure how modern CVTs behave in engaging drive from standing start.
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post

    But taking the semantics of the phrase then I woudl suspect it refers to a transmission capable of providing torque at zero speed.
    I think it refers to it having no gears. You know how 6speeds, 5 speeds and so on all have different numbers of gears...a cvt wouldn't have any, hence, Zero.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Canuck View Post
    I think it refers to it having no gears. You know how 6speeds, 5 speeds and so on all have different numbers of gears...a cvt wouldn't have any, hence, Zero.
    IN reality a proper CVT has infinite gears.
    So if someone is calling it "zero" then they're dumb
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Surrey, England
    Posts
    4,000
    So, if you're driving a car with a CVT gearbox, such as an Audi A6 Avant or MG F do you feel a gearchange or does it just feel like one long gear as it were?
    V0R5PRU7NG DUR6CH T3CHN1K

    Motion & Emotion

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Southeast US
    Posts
    5,582
    Zero-speed is a term used for transmissions describing points at which synchronizing takes place, also there are zero-speed sensors. I don't believe there is a 'zero-speed automatic transmission' per se.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Waugh-terfall View Post
    So, if you're driving a car with a CVT gearbox, such as an Audi A6 Avant or MG F do you feel a gearchange or does it just feel like one long gear as it were?
    NO in todays CVTs you feel gears.
    But that's because of DAF's Variomatic experiences
    People didn't feel comfortable with the way a CVT drives when "optimal".
    ie the engine revs to peak torque and then stays there while the car accelerates !!! All the way to max speed NO perceptible gear change.
    Also, people associate the kick when changing gear with "speed"

    SO in the dumbing down of CVT we have infintely variable transmissions which the computer will only place into 5 or 6 positions and use the engine revs in that posisiton before "changing" up/down.
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Waugh-terfall View Post
    So, if you're driving a car with a CVT gearbox, such as an Audi A6 Avant or MG F do you feel a gearchange or does it just feel like one long gear as it were?
    The MGF was available with a CVT gearbox?
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    260
    Maybe you meam seamless shift from f1. Those boxes operate with zero (almost zero) shift time so there is a constant flow of torque. Zeroshift makes gearboxes like that, and as you can see on the graph below there is zero shift time. First graph is standard Cerbera and second is Zeroshift equipped Cerbera
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Nulla tenaci invia est via

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,068
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    The MGF was available with a CVT gearbox?
    Er... not entirely sure on this, but the TF for sure was offered with the Stepspeed, also available on the ZR, ZS and ZT...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by IWantAnAudiRS6 View Post
    Er... not entirely sure on this, but the TF for sure was offered with the Stepspeed, also available on the ZR, ZS and ZT...
    But wasn't Stepspeed a conventional torque converter auto?
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,068
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    But wasn't Stepspeed a conventional torque converter auto?
    I think it was a semi-auto or something. Either way, not only was it pointless (on an MG, for God's sake), it was also crap.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. If you hated Speed TV before
    By CSL in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 11:10 AM
  2. Texas to have highest speed limit.
    By Blue Supra in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 08-31-2005, 06:20 PM
  3. How to drive fast but safely
    By Swissbeatz in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-03-2005, 03:40 PM
  4. 2003 Bentley Speed 8
    By DarkPhenix in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-02-2005, 07:54 PM
  5. Theoretical max speed of Lan Evo VIII GSR
    By KnifeEdge_2K1 in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-23-2004, 02:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •