Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: Mclaren Summoned Over Ferrari Secrets.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Southeast US
    Posts
    5,582

    Mclaren Summoned Over Ferrari Secrets.

    Serious implications for the McLaren team.


    FIA Summons McLaren Over Ferrari Secrets
    Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:13 AM EDT
    The Associated Press

    PARIS (AP) — The McLaren Formula One team was charged by the sport's governing body Thursday with unauthorized possession of secret Ferrari documents.

    McLaren was summoned to appear before FIA's world motor sport council in Paris on July 26 to explain how it gained possession of the documents, including information that can be used to design, engineer, build, check, test, develop and run a 2007 Ferrari F1 car.

    The case reached the High Court in London on Wednesday when McLaren chief designer Mike Coughlan, who was suspended by his team last week when documents were found in his house, agreed to tell Ferrari how he got hold of its design secrets.

    Coughlan has been linked to Ferrari's head of performance Nigel Stepney, who has already been fired by the team for allegedly sending the 780-page technical document to Coughlan.

    Stepney has denied it, although Ferrari won a court order to search the Coughlans' home and the documents were found, along with computers which are set to be examined by experts.

    Ferrari has also taken legal action in Italy against Stepney.

    McLaren team chief Ron Dennis has maintained his team did not break any rules.

    The FIA did not say what sanctions could be taken against McLaren if found guilty of breaking rules. It's possible the team could face a points deduction or expulsion from the championship.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    A classic case of corporate espionage. How interesting.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,272
    The McLaren Formula One team was charged... ...with unauthorized possession of secret Ferrari documents.

    ...when documents were found in his house
    McLaren F1 = Mike Coughlan's house?

    The FIA did not say what sanctions could be taken against McLaren if found guilty of breaking rules. It's possible the team could face a points deduction or expulsion from the championship.
    How can they prove Tombasis didn't tell Ferrari everything he knows about the MP4/22?

    McLaren beats Ferrari on track - Ferrari documents turn up at McLaren - FIA docks points...

    Conspiracy!!111!!
    Thanks for all the fish

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,414
    Quote Originally Posted by Coventrysucks View Post
    McLaren F1 = Mike Coughlan's house?

    How can they prove Tombasis didn't tell Ferrari everything he knows about the MP4/22?

    McLaren beats Ferrari on track - Ferrari documents turn up at McLaren - FIA docks points...

    Conspiracy!!111!!
    I don't think McLaren cheated, but then i'm biased... However, Steve Cropley and Alan Henry both agree that McLaren will almost certainly be cleared of any supposed wrong-doing.

    I also thought of a conspiracy, based upon the fact that McLaren were suddenly doing better than Ferrari, so they had to do something to bring themselves back to the top. You never know with Ferrari nowadays.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Land of hockey, maple syrup, and hot white chicks
    Posts
    1,249
    Corporations make a business of scape goating. So if the documents were found at Coughlan's house then his career is over, the team will see to it that he's burned to the stake alone or with as few accomplices as possible and continue on. Even if Coughlan talks all other evidence if anyone has it is likely shredded and burned and it'll be a game of he said she said which will go nowhere because that isn't enough to act upon.
    Be polite, Be professional, Be prepared to kill...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Coventrysucks View Post


    How can they prove Tombasis didn't tell Ferrari everything he knows about the MP4/22?
    I think there is a subtle difference between "telling" and "handing over a 500 page document"....don't let your utter dislike of Ferrari influence your normal reasonable way of thinking.....
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    3,545
    Meanwhile, before Magny-Cours I haven't seen these 'bridges' on the front wings of Formula-1 cars, at least so widely used. But they appeared in France on both Ferrari and McLaren at the same time. I thought about how could it be before I've heard of this scandal. And now.. what do you think, can this be somehow connected?
    In Silverstone I saw such 'bridges' on Red Bull's, too, but that time the week has gone, so it doesn't seem so strange.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,272
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    I think there is a subtle difference between "telling" and "handing over a 500 page document"....don't let your utter dislike of Ferrari influence your normal reasonable way of thinking.....
    Don't let your preconceptions about my likes and dislikes influence your normal reasonable way of thinking...

    Whenever a member of staff moves from team to team, of course they take confidential information with them.

    You can't suddenly switch off everything you have learned about aerodynamics, for example, whilst you worked there.

    I'm sure when Ferrari re-hired Tombasis they stipulated in his contract that he must not use any information he ever acquired whilst at McLaren.

    It is something that is totally unavoidable, and is routinely accepted without the FIA and Italian police raiding people's homes when they are on holiday.

    What can you do with a document?

    Unless you can interpret the information within it, and understand the context and how that integrates with what you are doing, it isn't much help.

    I'd say that having the person that authored a document, as opposed to just the document itself is potentially much more of a compromise.

    Then, you can hardly call it an F1 season without some controversy including the FIA and Ferrari against one of their main championship rivals, can you?

    That you can include the Italian police and a good old fashioned witch-hunt into the deal is just a healthy bonus.
    Thanks for all the fish

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Coventrysucks View Post
    Don't let your preconceptions about my likes and dislikes influence your normal reasonable way of thinking...
    I was not aware that they did....you ended your post with the word "conspiracy" and three exclamation marks

    and a document in the hands of experts is quite revealing, you do not need the author to explain it to them....unless of course the Ferrari concepts are way above the normal standard of thinking in the McLaren design department...
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,227
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    I was not aware that they did....you ended your post with the word "conspiracy" and three exclamation marks

    and a document in the hands of experts is quite revealing, you do not need the author to explain it to them....unless of course the Ferrari concepts are way above the normal standard of thinking in the McLaren design department...
    I have to agree. Whatever this document is it may have potentially important and useful information. Experts for McLaren could easily use this information to their advantage, but establishing a link that shows that McLaren acted in ill-faith is going to be tricky. McLaren can just say that the employee was working on his own and they never saw the document - simple as that, and how will anyone prove it otherwise?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Posts: 30,245
    Posts
    7,352
    it always seems to involve ferrari..

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Cotterik View Post
    it always seems to involve ferrari..
    the highest trees catch most of the wind....
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    91
    just because one member on McLaren took some documents doesn't necesserelly means that the F1 team should get any action.

    besides, who know this isn't a ferrari plan to get an advantage...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,160
    My personal opinion on this whole bizarre situation based on what few facts have emerged is that I don't think McLaren had anything to do with stealing secrets from Ferrari.

    If you look at the ridiculous circumstances of how Coughlan and Stepney were rumbled there's no way McLaren would have been involved IMO. The tip-off came to Ferrari after Trudy Coughlan (Mike's wife) was spotted in a public photocopying shop in Woking getting the whole 780-page document photocopied! I'm sorry, but there's just no way that, if McLaren had gone to all the trouble and been devious enough to get the documents in the first place, they'd be so incredibly stupid as to hand it all over to an employees wife to go down to the local shop and get it copied! You can't tell me that in their multi-zillion dollar uber-sophisticated state of the art McLaren headquarters that they don't have a photocopier or scanner lying around! It all just seems so hopelessly amateurish to have been a sophisticated industrial espionage job!

    Also there is the fact that although the FIA have summoned McLaren to answer charges the legal charges filed by Ferrari themselves are not against McLaren but just against the individuals, Stepney and Coughlan. Surely if they suspected McLaren of wrong-doing they'd be bringing the charges against them first and foremost?

    If I had to guess at what has been going on it from the statements that have been released I'd say the story goes like this...

    Nigel Stepney and Mike Coughlan are both frustrated or bored with life at their current teams. They get together and hatch a plan to hook up together at a new team and use the secrets/knowledge gained from their current employers. They hear that Honda are throwing about silly amounts of cash for hiring new staff and to desperately try to dig themselves out of the mess they're in. Stepney and Coughlan see their opportunity and arrange a meeting with Nick Fry at Honda about potential job opportunities (a meeting which we know took place in June sometime). Of course, they don't tell Honda that they're up to any kind of skulduggery. The plan is that, bringing the technical info they've pinched from Ferrari, they rock up at Honda and turn the absolute dog of a car that is currently there into a glorious, race winning car for next season. Coughlan and Stepney get hailed by all and sundry as magical, technical geniuses for turning things around so swiftly, and they achieve legendary status. And they all live happily ever after...

    ...except they got caught red handed.

    I'd wager that neither McLaren, Ferrari or Honda had any clue this was going on, it was a two man plot driven by their egos and career aspirations.

    I could be wrong of course, but that's my best guess based on the info so far.
    Last edited by Jack_Bauer; 07-13-2007 at 05:57 PM.
    uәʞoɹq spɹɐoqʎәʞ ʎɯ

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,560
    Jack, That is the 1st intelligently written, well considered post I've seen on this topic over several forums. Please stop bringing common sense to a discussion that so far has shown almost no factual information up to this point.
    Chief of Secret Police and CFO - Brotherhood of Jelly
    No Mr. Craig, I expect you to die! On the inside. Of heartbreak. You emo bitch

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. all cars all years 0-60 and 1/4mile time
    By matheus in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 04-26-2015, 06:29 PM
  3. Mercedes McLaren P8
    By bum-man in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-16-2008, 09:27 AM
  4. Ferrari and McLaren (One Pic)
    By lfb666 in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-23-2008, 04:20 PM
  5. Ferrari celebrates 60 year anniversary
    By mavanhaasteren in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-29-2007, 11:57 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •