Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 40

Thread: New CTS-V=BEAST!!!!

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    I'm waiting for it to get an insanely fast Nurburgring track time.

    Then I can laugh at both the Cadillac and BMW/Audi/Mercedes/Lexus fanboys when they try to defend their own favorite cars.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    6,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post



    Brand image will definitey be the Cadillac's demise in Europe, but this current CTS and CTS-V should pioneer a new era of GM respect in places outside of America. The CTS is a good car, but people have trouble looking past American history to throw away the stereotype. Also, $3000 isn't much when taking into account the MSRP and available options on all cars.
    In Europe, if someone wants a fast, V8 engined GM, they buy a Monaro or a VXR8...

  3. #18
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    16,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
    In Europe, if someone wants a fast, V8 engined GM, they buy a Monaro or a VXR8...
    Because this was the best option for an American v8 engined car. The CTS and CTS-v probably hold that claim now. I don't want to sound like a fan boy because I'm not, but this car didn't win Motor Trend car of the year for nothing.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    6,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post
    Because this was the best option for an American v8 engined car. The CTS and CTS-v probably hold that claim now. I don't want to sound like a fan boy because I'm not, but this car didn't win Motor Trend car of the year for nothing.
    You do make a good point.
    But, Motor Trend ___ of the year isn't anything to brag about for any manufacturer anymore, since they'll just hand out an award if they think a car deserves it. Usually it's something new from a manufacturer, like the Motor Trend Truck of the Year Toyota Tundra...I'm sure the Lexus IS-F will get one too (which is actually a Lexus I'm excited to see/hear)

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    It's got alot of horsepower.

    However it is a bloody cow, if we can bash the GT-R for this, we can bash the CTS-V. Also...it does not look good, honestly. Interesting car though.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    6,369
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Canuck View Post
    It's got alot of horsepower.

    However it is a bloody cow, if we can bash the GT-R for this, we can bash the CTS-V. Also...it does not look good, honestly. Interesting car though.
    The GT-R does bring something to the table, being a affordable "super" car...


    How much is the new CTS-V going to cost anyway?

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,991
    Quote Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
    In Europe, if someone wants a fast, V8 engined GM, they buy a Monaro or a VXR8...
    But nobody wants a V8 engined GM car over here

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post
    Also, I think since you guys have much better petrol, the CTS-V's gas mileage may increase a couple digits. Our 87 is like you're 95 octane.
    there's no difference in fuel, only the way you measure the octane rating
    Quote Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
    In Europe, if someone wants a fast, V8 engined GM, they buy a Monaro or a VXR8...
    they don't make the monaro anymore...but the VXR8 is subjectively better looking.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lagonda View Post
    But nobody wants a V8 engined GM car over here
    *can afford to run one, you mean..
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    So?

    The GT-R is still faster

    (waits for flame war)
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    16,602
    Quote Originally Posted by clutch-monkey View Post
    there's no difference in fuel, only the way you measure the octane rating
    Didn't know that. I figured octane ratings were universal.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post
    Didn't know that. I figured octane ratings were universal.
    America always measures things differently. fahrenheit, net hp, anything imperial..
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,508
    Quote Originally Posted by clutch-monkey View Post
    America always measures things differently. fahrenheit, net hp, anything imperial..
    Hey, we're just being loyal to the Queen... and stiffing her on a gallon of milk.

    Actually the octane ratings are different for a good reason. There are two good ways to measure octane. Rather than just settle on one or the other as Europe did, in the US it was decided to combine the two numbers to get an average value. As such the octane numbers are 100% scaleable. Two test samples of fuel may have the same rating using the RON method but not the MON method. As such the two fuel samples would have the same rating in Europe but a different rating in the US.

    Octane rating - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Redneckville, AL
    Posts
    622
    My only motivations for choosing this over any of its German competitors is that it will likely depreciate to my means quicker, and it comes with a manual.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Ozland
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbo.Jenkens View Post
    My only motivations for choosing this over any of its German competitors is that it will likely depreciate to my means quicker, and it comes with a manual.
    I need someone to explain something to me.
    I can see a lot of american V8 lovers are also fanatical about manual gearshifting, I'm not understanding the attraction when you have 1) unlimited torque everywhere in the modest rev range 2) meaty, clunky shift quality.
    On a sporty Honda or something where the powercurve has significance I can understand it, I bet an Auto NSX is not quicker around the 'Ring than it's manual equivalent.
    Horsepower wins races. Torque pulls trailers.

    http://www.nuerburgring.de/fileadmin/webcam/webcam.jpg <Live cast from the 'Ring.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Australia.
    Posts
    12,833
    Best looking Caddy i have seen....

    It's also got GTS rims.
    "Just a matter of time i suppose"

    "The elevator is broke, So why don't you test it out"

    "I'm not trapped in here with all of you, Your all trapped in here with me"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Cadillac CTS (1st gen) 2002-2007
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-15-2013, 06:39 AM
  2. Mercedes C-Class vs. Cadillac CTS
    By MBMaybach in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 05:25 AM
  3. Cadillac CTS Coupe Concept 2008
    By 90ft in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-26-2008, 09:47 AM
  4. 2005 Cadillac CTS
    By smith12 in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-29-2005, 02:49 AM
  5. CT's Vacation
    By CHEESE-TACULAR in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-28-2005, 05:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •