Honda to ax the S2000

[NSXType-R]

Not really news, they were going to do so anyway.

How come Honda goes nuts and cancels all of their sports cars all of a sudden? It's not doing all that horribly.

See, imagine if a company like Porsche did that?

Seems more like a knee jerk reaction. I mean, Nissan's not worried and they unveiled the 370Z lately.

I do admit that the S2000 is old and should be replaced (but the basic formula be untouched, just advanced), but seems like a bad idea, especially with no halo car for Honda.

[Matra et Alpine]

It is one of those cars that under current economic climate is one of the first things to get rid of.

NO, sadly the resale values on performacne sports cars are so bad it's now as well to keep it.
You can get UK RX-8s one year old for less than £8K !! GULP !!

How come Honda goes nuts and cancels all of their sports cars all of a sudden? It's not doing all that horribly.

I woudl suspect it's their highest production cost, lowest revenue and possibly lowest profit line vehicle and so gets itself into the firing line for what to cut regardless of what type of car it is.
SHame but no point having halo cars and going bust

[coolieman1220]

Not really news, they were going to do so anyway.

How come Honda goes nuts and cancels all of their sports cars all of a sudden? It's not doing all that horribly.

See, imagine if a company like Porsche did that?

Seems more like a knee jerk reaction. I mean, Nissan's not worried and they unveiled the 370Z lately.

I do admit that the S2000 is old and should be replaced (but the basic formula be untouched, just advanced), but seems like a bad idea, especially with no halo car for Honda.

what many car companies do that honda seems not to is that they share parts designs engines and all that good stuff. The 370 is on the same platform as many of nissans models and variations of others. (G sedan and coupe, M sedan, maxima, fx.) honda had a different engine and chassis for the nsx and the s2000. they do share some parts with the accord and civics. gm platform shares as well of course they do it incessantly . porshce also shares a lot. its much more cost effective!

[Sledgehammer]

NO, sadly the resale values on performacne sports cars are so bad it's now as well to keep it.

Just what JC said, something like "the last twenty years we have all been plaing musical chairs with our cars, but now the music stopped and everyones stuck with what they got."

[TVR IS KING]

They're doing the Toyota thing. Axing their sporty models (Celica, Supra, etc.) and replacing them with nothing but a boring image.

[P4g4nite]

have they not also killed the successor to the S2000?

[Ferrer]

I woudl suspect it's their highest production cost, lowest revenue and possibly lowest profit line vehicle and so gets itself into the firing line for what to cut regardless of what type of car it is.
SHame but no point having halo cars and going bust

Hmmm... Next thread is bye bye Corvette...

[P4g4nite]

I know Monaro Country and Co. have been championing the ZR1 but it is really an embarrassing indulgence of a bankrupt company, The base model Corvette will of course survive but it will have to cope with market more interest in value/mile than value/HP.

[coolieman1220]

Hmmm... Next thread is bye bye Corvette...

NEVER!!! AMERICA IS NO PUSSY!!!!

our open roads need sports cars!

toyota isn't doin too bad though after they axed their sports cars....

[RacingManiac]

what many car companies do that honda seems not to is that they share parts designs engines and all that good stuff. The 370 is on the same platform as many of nissans models and variations of others. (G sedan and coupe, M sedan, maxima, fx.) honda had a different engine and chassis for the nsx and the s2000. they do share some parts with the accord and civics. gm platform shares as well of course they do it incessantly . porshce also shares a lot. its much more cost effective!

Thats what I suspect too. In Honda's lineup those 2 stands as the odd ones out. No other Honda shares their chassis or drivertrain(and they don't share that between them either), I am sure it costs relatively high to supply those 2 models and having to maintain the lines that does not produce anything else.

[LeonOfTheDead]

Thats what I suspect too. In Honda's lineup those 2 stands as the odd ones out. No other Honda shares their chassis or drivertrain(and they don't share that between them either), I am sure it costs relatively high to supply those 2 models and having to maintain the lines that does not produce anything else.

wasn't the 2.0 liter from the S2000 the same you could find in a Civic Type R?

[RacingManiac]

With the installation being different I'd imagine most of the other parts other than the engine itself is not interchanable. Such that S2000 would probably need its own tranny, intake/exhaust manifold, and probably other supporting auxiliary....

Also later S2000 having the 2.2 liter engine makes it unique again, since I don't believe it is the same 2.2 as used by Prelude before...

[LeonOfTheDead]

With the installation being different I'd imagine most of the other parts other than the engine itself is not interchanable. Such that S2000 would probably need its own tranny, intake/exhaust manifold, and probably other supporting auxiliary....

Also later S2000 having the 2.2 liter engine makes it unique again, since I don't believe it is the same 2.2 as used by Prelude before...

I think so too, just want to be sure about the engine.

[roosterjuicer]

To be honest, the s2000 was the only Honda i wouldn't immediately turn around and sell if it was given to me for free. That thing was a pretty unique car, a really sharp looking small convertible that wasn't feminine at all. It was relatively fast, it was pretty, it used to not have much competition, and it had a sweet motor. I especially liked the old 2.0 litre one, I feel like it lost some of its personality with the bigger motor.

I dont think Honda is making a mistake getting rid of it, but I do think the world is loosing a good car

[Vanishing Boy]

-> ...

NOOoOOOOOO i wanted to get one after i graduated college... and preferably a new one
Im so sadddd

^ All hope is not lost, you can get a decent used one.

A new S2000 is ridiculous, my friend got one for around $35k, too much money...

Here's a used one, 13k miles (practically new) for US $19k - And it's a 2005, so it comes with the 2.2L engine.

^ Mine is also one of the great few examples:
- 2004
- Sebring Silver
- 37K mi
- one owner
- has tinted windows
- Skunk2 exhaust
- K&N CAI
- USD$ 17.5K

A sad sad day for car lovers everywhere. If a huge company like Honda is having to do this, then what about smaller less stable companies ???

^ I'd bet this will be only a short period only, once the market comes back...who knows?

have they not also killed the successor to the S2000?

^ Yes for now.

They're doing the Toyota thing. Axing their sporty models (Celica, Supra, etc.) and replacing them with nothing but a boring image.

^ Um, was the Civic Si boring? I don't think so compared to the tasteless Corolla XRS.

wasn't the 2.0 liter from the S2000 the same you could find in a Civic Type R?

^ No. The Honda 2.0L found on the Civic/Integra Type-R is the K20. While the S2K is powered by the epic F20C. The K20 is transverse-mounted (side to side), while the F20 is longitudinal (front to back). The K20 is suited for engine swaps to the Atom, S1/2 Elise/Exige, and the MR-S/MR-2 Spyder. The F20 and be fitted on any AE86's, E30/E36 3-series, and older FR-cars.

With the installation being different I'd imagine most of the other parts other than the engine itself is not interchanable. Such that S2000 would probably need its own tranny, intake/exhaust manifold, and probably other supporting auxiliary....

Also later S2000 having the 2.2 liter engine makes it unique again, since I don't believe it is the same 2.2 as used by Prelude before...

^ You're right the two engines are not the same or even related. The Prelude is powered by the Honda H22, the S2000 (USDM AP2) is powered by the Honda F22C.

I think so too, just want to be sure about the engine.

^ Although back in the late '90s, along with other older Accord's and Prelude's, they do powered by the same F-engine family. It is pretty complicated to explain here. But in in the shortest term, the F20C/F22C are a different engines.

To be honest, the s2000 was the only Honda i wouldn't immediately turn around and sell if it was given to me for free. That thing was a pretty unique car, a really sharp looking small convertible that wasn't feminine at all. It was relatively fast, it was pretty, it used to not have much competition, and it had a sweet motor. I especially liked the old 2.0 litre one, I feel like it lost some of its personality with the bigger motor.

I dont think Honda is making a mistake getting rid of it, but I do think the world is loosing a good car

^ Word up to your words! Since the F20 delivers more smiles per rpm than the F22. But on an everyday mulling, the F22 is more rewarding.