Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 49

Thread: Team Lotus Buys Caterham

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Depends on what they want to do.
    IF they follow tradition then I can see them going 5 cyl ( but limited availabiliyu/benefit ) or a Powertec V8
    But I'm betting they'll stick with a mainstream Japanese supplier and try to get volume
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Gods Country, USA
    Posts
    1,546
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum9987 View Post
    I think we can expect great things from Caterham now. But as to what, I haven't a clue.
    How about we expect great things from lotus now? judging by their upcoming cars, they could use a nice injection of caterham!
    A woman goes to the doctor to figure out why she is having breathing problems...The doctor tells her she is overweight. She says she wants a second opinion...the doctor says, "your ugly".

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by roosterjuicer View Post
    How about we expect great things from lotus now? judging by their upcoming cars, they could use a nice injection of caterham!
    Don't speak too soon!

    It could be the other way round...
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Gods Country, USA
    Posts
    1,546
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    Don't speak too soon!

    It could be the other way round...
    Lets hope not!
    A woman goes to the doctor to figure out why she is having breathing problems...The doctor tells her she is overweight. She says she wants a second opinion...the doctor says, "your ugly".

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    So what you get is a paintjob (which is already available on the Classic BTW) and an invitation to the factory. Yeah, thats on the lackluster side of things....
    "Don't think your time on bad things
    Just float your little mind around"
    Jimi Hendrix

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    6,534
    Quote Originally Posted by roosterjuicer View Post
    How about we expect great things from lotus now? judging by their upcoming cars, they could use a nice injection of caterham!
    Wrong Lotus.. the Team Lotus that bought Caterham is nothing to do with the Group Lotus that is Lotus Cars.
    Life's too short to drive bad cars.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    411
    im not suprised, they both build very similar vehicles

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by FastDriver View Post
    im not suprised, they both build very similar vehicles
    your idea of the transaction is wrong. Team Lotus/Tony Fernandez so far only owned the name Team Lotus and has no production facilities at all.
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    411
    oh, I must have read that wrong. I thought the car companies were merging

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    N.Z.
    Posts
    436
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum9987 View Post
    Turbo stroker hayabusa motor perhaps? 12000 RPM and a shit load of boost equal 500HP on a whim. Significantly lighter than the current supercharged 2.4L v8 at that. Hell, a Turbo charged Hayabusa pushing 650HP just did a 248 on the Texas Mile. And that had stock internals, save 8:1 pistons. Now put a larger crank, perhaps some heads, lightweight conrods, cams, and you've got a rev happy beast that can safely push 550hp. Oh god its a dream. Yes, I've thought about doing this before.
    a 7 is all a motorbike based engine would be good for. they are not suited to pushing heavy cars around

    personally id like to see an 1800cc version of Honda's RCV211

    (perfectly balanced)
    Last edited by Badsight; 05-03-2011 at 10:58 PM.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    N.Z.
    Posts
    436
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    turbo cannot get torque at low revs.
    Needs supercharger adn then it's taking lots of power when you dont want it

    By the time you go large turbo on a small I4 you get to being quite heavy
    Especially if looking at bike tech with light alloys and designed for revs not torque.
    Twin Charging

    while more complex, cannot be faulted in power delivery

    if you want a 2.0 four to out muscle a V8 at any engine speed then you want Twin Charging

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    With twins it's just more weight so going all the wrong way
    Plumbing even a single turbo into a single seater is a horrible compromise, can't imagine where to find the space for 1 1/2

    But yeah, if it's just power then you can keep adding things to reach it.

    When turbo are allowed back in top motorsport watch out for the advances in the variable vane tech. A great solution just not being driven hard enough through innovation.

    Not sure about the wish for a larger RC2111 ... Audi did that game most successfully already 20 years ago. The 211V advatange was a different delivery profile on power which matters a lot in a bike and not in a car.
    Last edited by Matra et Alpine; 05-04-2011 at 01:09 AM.
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    N.Z.
    Posts
    436
    yeah but the engine will go however you tune it

    compared to sticking the larger again V8, it strikes me as an interesting alternative. an extremely compact 5 cylinder nestled right in the center of the 7's engine bay

    the size difference between it & the Duratec ford engine would be immediatly noticeable

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    ah, maybe different wants in us B
    I dont mind how it looks in an engine bay
    I just want it light, low and as far back as possible !!
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Lotus City Car Concept
    By Ecnelis in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-06-2010, 03:25 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-29-2010, 05:42 PM
  3. Transorientale 2008
    By faksta in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 05:19 PM
  4. Lotus 2-Eleven 2007-2011
    By 90ft in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-03-2007, 01:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •