Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: rear drive compacts

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    127

    rear drive compacts

    Now that Chrysler has made the first all-new rear drive American sedan since....whenever (the new 300), it's time for a manufacturer to do the same with compacts, preferably with sport compacts. I've heard on different websites about how people want to convert their focus/cavalier/neon to rear wheel drive, because that format has better performance (and is also more fun to drive!) I've driven both formats in the winter, and it really isn't that big of a deal. With good snow tires, and being cautious, rear drive is definately ok in the winter.

    There are some things that front driver's just can't overcome, no matter how advanced they get, and how much horsepower they produce. With a rear-drive car, you can do donuts (yee haw!) oversteer when turning (better cornering, if you have skill), and a better launch (a car's weight shifts back when you accelerate, which is fine for a rear drive car).

    I say enough is enough, and demand that Detroit produce a new, cheap, rear drive compact!

    A couple rear drive compacts of the past:
    Chevrolet Chevette
    Toyota Corolla
    Hyundai Pony/Stellar

    A couple potentials: Pontiac Solstice, Dodge Razor (they aren't really compacts as I see them, they're 2-seat roadsters)
    Life begins @ 200 MPH
    There's no replacement for displacement.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    420
    Hear, hear. As a big fan of small RWD cars I'm with you all the way. Part of the reason I put so much effort into keeping my 88 Nissan 200SX going strong is that you just can't buy a small, RWD hatchback like that anymore.
    "The good news is, not one of the 50 states has the death penalty for speeding....although I'm not too sure about Ohio."

    Sesquipedalian -- a really cool word. It means long-winded, polysyllabic, or verbose. See the word describes itself...isn't that neat?

    1988 Nissan 200SX SE V6

    UCP's most hardcore S12 fan!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Some of the best (fun) rally cars were rear-drive compacts ...

    Escort
    Sunbeam
    Chevette
    Kadette
    and a few more of lessor success

    Shame that for the first 3, they were HEAVILY revised for the US market and never managed to be the success they were over here




    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Northampton, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    7,989
    A rear-drive Dodge Stratus Coupe R/T would be wonderful. With a 6-speed option. Mmmmm, 6-speed...

    And I've seen conversion kits for the Focus, but they're incredibly pricey. And you're still driving a Ford Focus...
    [O o)O=\x/=O(o O]

    The things we do for girls who won't sleep with us.

    Patrick says:
    dads is too long so it wont fit
    so i took hers out
    and put mine in

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    127
    I just read that the new Pontiac solstice will be based on the Kappa frame; which I think is the same as cobalt. Maybe they'll offer a kit in the future to convert the cobalt? Maybe they'll offer that as an option?
    Life begins @ 200 MPH
    There's no replacement for displacement.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
    Some of the best (fun) rally cars were rear-drive compacts ...

    Escort
    Sunbeam
    Chevette
    Kadette
    and a few more of lessor success

    Shame that for the first 3, they were HEAVILY revised for the US market and never managed to be the success they were over here
    Rallying is a sport where I think it is actually an advantage to have a front-driver compared to a rear-driver. (AWD is still the best) Rallying is all about handling, cornering, braking. Accelleration is very traction-limited. Although in a hairpin turn, a rear-driver would be an advantage because you could oversteer through it instead of understeering right off the track
    Life begins @ 200 MPH
    There's no replacement for displacement.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by HemiCuda500
    Rallying is a sport where I think it is actually an advantage to have a front-driver compared to a rear-driver. (AWD is still the best) Rallying is all about handling, cornering, braking. Accelleration is very traction-limited. Although in a hairpin turn, a rear-driver would be an advantage because you could oversteer through it instead of understeering right off the track
    Mk2 Escorts STILL score well in National rallies against the Super1600s which are all FWDs.
    Traction out of ALL corners is better in a RWD especially once you get to 200bhp. FWDs just scrabble
    BTW, in tight corners the FWD driver will left-foot brake the car into oversteer and in hairpins a hydraulic handbrake works wonders
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    I think if America returned to RWD compacts, they would have to be sports compacts at first, because anything like what BMW has done with the 1 Series, but for family use would still intrude too much on rear legroom, which is why FWD is used. I'd like to see it happen though
    I am the Stig

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    In most peoples mind, Rear Drive equals sporty.
    Not necessarily the case, look at the Peugeot 205 GTi and Volkswagen Mk1 Golf GTi.
    But it's more a psychological thing, knowing you've got two for turnign, two for burning, as the saying goes.
    a lot of people will sacrifice a lot, like interior room, for Sheer Driving Pleasure. The 1-Series will be testament to that, it will complete BMW's rung from down and out Bavarian to World Car, to the average family hatchback.
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    I personally think itll be a move in the right driection...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    BMW's are meant to be a bit special, not a mass-market car.

    Give it 20 years and it'll be in the same boat as Ford is now.
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    Quote Originally Posted by IBrake4Rainbows
    BMW's are meant to be a bit special, not a mass-market car.

    Give it 20 years and it'll be in the same boat as Ford is now.
    A bitspeacial...whats so special about being ultra soft? they handel like boats and make carollas and other cars look fast....im talking bread and butter models here but the only special things i can see about them is their price tag...specially desgined to rob you of alot of money....

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by HemiCuda500
    A couple potentials: Pontiac Solstice, Dodge Razor (they aren't really compacts as I see them, they're 2-seat roadsters)
    Ya, it's a shame though, I don't think they will ever bring out the Razor to production. That would have been one hell of a car, it was light and had one hell of an engine. I guess we will have to wait for the Dodge Slingshot which is heavly based on the European Roadster, yes it's RWD .

    1977 Mercedes-benz 240D 4-speed with 500k miles

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
    Some of the best (fun) rally cars were rear-drive compacts ...

    Escort
    Sunbeam
    Chevette
    Kadette
    and a few more of lessor success

    Shame that for the first 3, they were HEAVILY revised for the US market and never managed to be the success they were over here
    [nostalgia photos]
    The rear-wheel drive Escort did not make it Stateside (alas), the hapless Yank Fordsters could only get the Pinto (OK, and its cursed spawn the Mustang-II as well); in 1981 they got a front-drive Escort, based on the one from Germany.
    I don't recall any US-specification version of the Chrysler Sunbeam (there was an ill-fated Yank-version of the Hillman Avenger, called Plymouth Cricket or Crocket), I do recall the Chevrolet Chevette and Pontiac T1000, let’s just say the adaptation was lesser than the original as in many Hollywood remakes of films from the other side of the ocean.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    So matra what would be a good buy in the lesser kown ones?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Cheap, Mid engine, Rear Wheel Drive who's the best
    By mechanixfetch in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 10-21-2009, 11:49 PM
  2. Front wheel drive, rear wheel drive or all wheel drive?
    By morobas in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 12-03-2006, 07:37 AM
  3. '04 Goodwood Festival of Speed
    By DB9Vantage in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-15-2004, 03:22 PM
  4. Territory test drive
    By fpv_gtho in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-19-2003, 01:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •