Page 23 of 25 FirstFirst ... 132122232425 LastLast
Results 331 to 345 of 373

Thread: New Magna

  1. #331
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    its too bad there was only about 20kw difference between the 6 and 8 though

  2. #332
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    yeah and the xr6 was faster the 8 had 8 kw more then hodens engine which was 160kw and motor raved about fords new v8 then.

  3. #333
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    well waddaya know, weve gone back to the EB days where the XR6 is quicker than the XR8. 160kw by todays standards doesnt seem very much, yet if someone was to get an EB V8 they'd think it would have plenty of power

  4. #334
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    the xr6t is not faster thent he xr8 but its damn near but still the 160kw wuidnsor seems tame by todays standards but it still will move a basic 3.9 ea can do 200 and thats witrh a fair bit to spare all the newer baseline cars are faster then you might think and hell look at the BA an XT can cut a high 15 now for your bread and butter mdoel thats damn good VPs and EBs used to do that youll notice while driveng one of them the cars are lighter have a better exaust note and probly pick up a little faster up hill.

  5. #335
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    the quickest times ive seen for the XR6T and XR8 have been 5.9 and 6.1 0-100km/h but the gap closes down the quarter mile

  6. #336
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    People are paying close attention to the XR6 more becuase all our local car mage (minus the commadore ones) are giving up a lot of collum space to put all the info on the tuned XR6Ts for about 3 months now street machine has a peice on them wheels has had a few page write up motor has had a few bits and peices BOOST has had several big articles on it and performance ford mage has a peice on it every issue and AMC (austrlain Muscle car) have had a few smallish peices on it.

  7. #337
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    well thats alot of effort people are putting in, its no wonder people are predicting it will be the next cult car. id like to see whether a turbo HFV6 is as easy to tune though, as holden most definately will put out a turbo commodore V6

  8. #338
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    Well holden as plannign on makeing a turbo motor with the current HSV it had wait for it 239kw but it fell through.

  9. #339
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    6,153
    Waste of time making a sub 240kw 6cl HSV when you can buy a 245kw SV8 for $40000. Then spend the rest of the money you saved on extra goodies. $150 K&N air filter, $400 SS inductions cold air intake and $1500 on extractors and exhaust. You would still probably have change from the HSV price to put a good CD player in if only it was possible..
    "A string is approximately nine long."
    Egg Nogg 02-04-2005, 05:07 AM

  10. #340
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    well although the $49K XU-6 fell through when ford released details for the XR6T then fulfilled the promise, HSV said the extra $10K over the S supercharged, although only 9kw more, was "cheap" entry into an HSV. holden wont leave the 6 cylinder market to the XR6T and although it has its own SV8 to get around, not only is it turbo 6 power to 8, but id say the actual car minus the engines would be vastly different. i reckon though that after HSV pulled the plug on the XU-6 that holden shouldve taken the 180kw 6 for the S supercharged

  11. #341
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    6,153
    Originally posted by fpv_gtho
    well although the $49K XU-6 fell through when ford released details for the XR6T then fulfilled the promise, HSV said the extra $10K over the S supercharged, although only 9kw more, was "cheap" entry into an HSV. holden wont leave the 6 cylinder market to the XR6T and although it has its own SV8 to get around, not only is it turbo 6 power to 8, but id say the actual car minus the engines would be vastly different. i reckon though that after HSV pulled the plug on the XU-6 that holden shouldve taken the 180kw 6 for the S supercharged
    HSV may have a little more to play with when the new 6 is in the cars. The flexibility of maybe being able to work with the engine plant itself. I still fail to see the point in worrying about 6 cylinders in HSVs when it is always going to be a backward step from the V8 in the same body.
    "A string is approximately nine long."
    Egg Nogg 02-04-2005, 05:07 AM

  12. #342
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    well until HSV get the HFV6, making a V6 HSV is gunna be considered a backwards step compared to the current outputs of the gen3. if they had the 180kw six when they were still making 220kw GTS's, then it wouldve been accepted. holden have said that they will be able to make turbo HFV6's and after seeing the huge public response to the XR6T (possibly only down to the fact its the same interior as the XR8, $6K cheaper and slightly faster) they will be considering putting the engine in one of their cars

  13. #343
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    Yeah but the gen IV is supposed to be all that much better then the gen three and it is supposed to top out at around 6.somthing liters so the hfv6 will seem as limp wristed as the current v6 sitting next to it.

  14. #344
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    well especially for the HFV6, holden wont stretch it out right to the full potential cause they like their cars to be able to handle 91 RON petrol which might restrict power slightly but who really knows where theyre gunna take the outputs of either of the engines. they could keep them at similar levels to what they are now and chase after better fuel economy

  15. #345
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    Yeah that is also all well and true but with a new model impending the weight of the car will more then likly ballon kerbing the power these flash new engines have look at the BA if the norman barra 6 was in an au you migh see a high 14 instead of the mid 15 it gets in the ba

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •