what do you think of the new subaru sti
what do you think of the new subaru sti
Dont think anyone in here is going to say something bad about this one !!
----R.I.P----
"Misho Ratio"
2003 - 2004
it is a great car as far as performance sedans go, for me right now it wholdnt serve any better a purpouse than a civic sedan would... but over all its an A+
UCP's Most Hardcore Burro!
Being human explains everything but excuses nothing
Make Subaru
Year 2003
Engine Location Front
Drive Type AWD
Weight 2965 lbs | 1344.9 kg.
Gears 6
Transmission Type manual
Final Drive NA
Price NA
Skidpad NA
Body Material NA
Steering NA
Engine
Cylinders 4
Engine Configuration Inline
Aspiration/Induction Turbocharged
Displacement 2.5 L | 122.0 cu in. | 1999.6 cc.
Valves NA
Valvetrain DOHC
Horsepower 220.8 Kw / 300 BHP
Torque 406.8 Nm / 300 Ft-lbs @ 4000 RPM
Bore NA
Stroke NA
Compression Ratio NA
Dimensions | Chassis | Body
Length 173.4 in | 4394.2 mm. | 4.4 m.
Width 68.1 in | 1727.2 mm. | 1.7 m.
Height 56.7 in | 1447.8 mm. | 1.4 m.
Wheelbase 99.4 in | 2514.6 mm. | 2.5 m.
Front Track NA
Rear Track NA
Ground Clearance NA
Cargo Volume NA
Passenger Volume NA
Interior Volume NA
Bed Length NA
Seating Capacity NA
Performance
0-60 mph NA
1/4 Mile NA
Top Speed NA
Suspension
Front Suspension NA
Rear Suspension NA
Towing
Towing Capacity NA
Brakes
Front Brakes
Front Brake Size NA
Rear Brakes
Rear Brake Size NA
Tires
17-inch
Front Tire NA
Rear Tire NA
for the price they want this car i would pay for this or the rally car there all nice and i hope they come out with a better sti with more that 320hp
I think they are a great car ...... incredible performance for a reasonable price .... not to mention room for 4 "real" people.
It is quite a nice car it handels good and is quite fast is also recently won its class in motor magizines Bang For Your Buck$ (DFYB)
One queastion i have and at the risk of sounding stupid i thought the subarus used a "flat" engine not an inline altough ive heard stories that they were thinking of changing the layout.
they use the "boxer" engine, ive heard of no plans otherwise the STi has the 2.5 liter turbo while the 2.5 RS has the 2.5 liter n/a version, the regular WRX has the 2 liter turbo all are horazontaly opposed "boxer" engines
UCP's Most Hardcore Burro!
Being human explains everything but excuses nothing
Well in the information that crasy_for_cars gave he stated it had an inline engine configuration i was mainly asking becuase i heard stories they wanted to go to a v4 instead of the boxer engine it sort of threw me off and as you might of guessed im not very up to date with WRX's.
i didnt think they where arranged inline either, otherwise how would they twin turbo it for the libertey?
its possible to twin turbocharge a car if the engine is an inline configuration the supra for example is twin turbocharged with an inline 6 cylinder. the suberus have a boxer engine where the 2 banks of cylinders are layed out in a flat horizontaly opposed setup hence the term "flat-4"
UCP's Most Hardcore Burro!
Being human explains everything but excuses nothing
is there such a thing as a V4 engine ??
----R.I.P----
"Misho Ratio"
2003 - 2004
Lancia and matra used to be very big on v4s (they are the only 2 examples i can think off the top of my head) And it has all the upsides of a v shaped block Balance,size etc etc it sounded like an alright idea and it wouldent need the massive conter weights the boxer engine neeeds when you begine to really modify them (usually 12 seconds on the 1/4 or faster)
im shure there where V4 engine configurations by many car comapnys bt most opted for the inline 4 probly due to its smzll size, lower weight and ease of mounting on smaller cars in a FWD configuration(i.e. less exhaust plumbing) with fewer parts(i.e. 1 head instead of 2)
UCP's Most Hardcore Burro!
Being human explains everything but excuses nothing
I never did think of the les parts and ease of mounting in fwd cars i still think a v4 woulden be such a bad idea though.
well, it probably isnt better than the inline 4. coz i assume that some research and financing was already placed into playing around with the V4 configurations as well as the inline, and since all we see today is inline 4s.Originally posted by Falcon500
I never did think of the les parts and ease of mounting in fwd cars i still think a v4 woulden be such a bad idea though.
but that not necessarily true, coz using the same rational, then rotary engines arent as good as Mazda claims either coz no one else uses them.
its a bit confusing this whole "which engine configuration is better" thing !!
----R.I.P----
"Misho Ratio"
2003 - 2004
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)