Those cars weren't quite so revolutionary, were they?
I'm pretty sure they pretended to benefit from the name, but then the idea backfired so they had to find a solution.
I don't dislike the car, and the DS range could very well turn out to be something very worthy, but still the name was a complete mistake.
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
It looks as though Citroen might have lost their nerve...again.
May I present the new C4.
<cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>
It's the new ZX. Quite disappointing.
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams
How about the Honda FCX Clarity? Not because James May reviewed it and Clarkson actually liked it, but because it actually seems reasonable as long as you can get around the hydrogen production issue.
And unlike Tesla, Honda is an actual established company that does not deal in vaporware. That's my major issue with Tesla.
I'm sorry Pieter but it is. It's a bit like the Mk III Focus probably, if the first one hadn't existed this wouldn't be criticised. But since there's a previous C4 between the Xsara and this, it fails to excite.
Maybe the DS4 can spice things up a bit.
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
having the same front and some parts of the hatch does mot really make it look like a ZX, but I have to admit that I was not aware that the ZX was still in production with that shape. But it is a popluar taxi in China. (and sold nowhere else)
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)